Relativity- stars and spacecraft.

C.E
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
1.a.) A star is 450 light years from earth.
i) what is the minimum time a spacecraft could make a return trip to this star?
ii)How fast should the spacecraft travel to make the journey in 30 astranaught years?
iii) What is the distance of eart to this star as measured by the astronauts on their 30 year journey?

my answer
1.(i). 900 years
(ii). I tried to do this by solving the following length contraction/ time dilation simultaneous equations:

(where g is gamma and L0=900, to=30)
Lg=lo
t=tog

and whatever I do I can't seem to eliminate enough variables, i.e. I always have a solution in both g and L or t and g or everything disappears and I get 0=0. Are these the right equations to start with? If so, what is going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi C.E! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have a gamma: γ and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
C.E said:
1.(i). 900 years

Yes.
(ii). I tried to do this by solving the following length contraction/ time dilation simultaneous equations:

(where g is gamma and L0=900, to=30)
Lg=lo
t=tog

You don't need length-contraction …

do everything in the "stationary" frame, and then use time dilation (only) to convert the time to astronaut time. :wink:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top