Relativity, the flow of time and speed

atymtrvlr
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Question:

According to Einstein an object traveling at relativistic speeds would not experience the passage of time (time stands still).

Speaking from the vantage point of the relativistic object:

Let's consider a photon. At 1C time stands still for the photon (T=0).

1. With the absence of time, isn’t the relative velocity of the photon actually infinite (again, from the vantage point of the photon)?

By this I mean V=D/T where V=velocity, D=distance and T=time

Speed is relative to distance traveled in a given unit of time. If T reaches 0 (zero) the calculation cannot be performed & speed cannot be determined.

In another example, if you were in a car traveling at 1C, your speedometer wouldn't function. It requires space and time to calulate speed.

Is this right? Does anyone have any thoughts on this?

I also have a follow-up question.

Thanks!
atymtrvlr
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You went off the rails at the very beginning

atymtrvlr said:
Is this right?...
According to Einstein an object traveling at relativistic speeds would not experience the passage of time (time stands still).

No, "relativistic velocities" means "fast enough that relativistic formulas must be used". You are thinking of taking the limit v \rightarrow c=1 in the Lorentz transformation, but this fails as you can check. Physically speaking the reason is easy to understand: if you try to accelerate a particle of mass m to the speed of light you will need an infinite amount of energy, which is impossible.

Several items from the sci.physics FAQ should help: see http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/
 
Thanks

For the response.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top