Renormalisation constants in QED

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackie1008
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Qed
blackie1008
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have been deriving the renormalisation constants in QED as part of my project. I have been using Peskin and Schroeder. I am a bit confused with a couple of things and was wondering if anyone could please help!

Firstly, why do we chose not to absorb the Z_3 constant in the electron charge but rather the photon wavefunction?

Secondly, why, when we have used the Ward identity to prove Z_1=Z_2 do we then include them separately in the electron charge renormalisation when they just cancel?

(This is around about p330-331 in Peskin and Schroeder)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
blackie1008 said:
Hi,

I have been deriving the renormalisation constants in QED as part of my project. I have been using Peskin and Schroeder. I am a bit confused with a couple of things and was wondering if anyone could please help!

Firstly, why do we chose not to absorb the Z_3 constant in the electron charge but rather the photon wavefunction?

Secondly, why, when we have used the Ward identity to prove Z_1=Z_2 do we then include them separately in the electron charge renormalisation when they just cancel?

(This is around about p330-331 in Peskin and Schroeder)
One can absorb terms only in terms of the same form, and one needs all these terms.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top