Renormalization differential equation ?

tpm
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Renormalization differential equation ??

Let's suppose we have in perturbation theory the quantities

(m_0 , q_0 , G_0 (x,s))

With m,q, and G(x,s) the 'mass' 'charge' and 'Green function' (propagator)

and the sub-index '0' here stands for "free" theory (no interactions)

Then my question is if there is a PDE , ODE or similar that relates the 'renormalized' (finite values) of the interacting theory

(m_R , q_R , G_R (x,s)) (R=renormalization) and

(m_0 , q_0 , G_0 (x,s))

So we can use this PDE no matter if the theory is non-renormalizable or not to extract finite values, for several quantities as mass charge and so on.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you have to realize that these so called "beta functions" are usually calculated by perturbative methods.and you cannot trust your perturbation theory if your expansion parameter becomes large.they generally yield "asymptotic series".Now the point is that to what scales you can trust a solution generated from an eqn derived from pertubation theory. usually, as it happens, for non-renormalisable theories, the couplings et al blow up at large energy scales. but it is my guess that if you are working at low energy scales, as in an effective theory, you can still do that!
 
And how is this derived ??..i mean the renormalization group equation..and why can't be applied to NOn-renormalizable theories??, i have tried reading the Wikipedia article but it's rather 'fuzzy' without explaining they impose the condition:

\frac{d Z[\Lambda]}{d\Lambda}=0

after introducing a momentum cut-off so p \le \Lambda and introducing a misterious function R_{\Lambda}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
47
Views
16K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top