Representations of the cyclic group of order n

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading James and Liebeck's book on Representations and Characters of Groups.

Exercise 1 of Chapter 3 reads as follows:

Let G be the cyclic group of order m, say G = < a : a^m = 1 >.

Suppose that A \in GL(n \mathbb{C} ), and define \rho : G \rightarrow GL(n \mathbb{C} ) by

\rho : a^r \rightarrow A^r \ \ (0 \leq r \leq m-1 )

Show that \rho is a representation of G over \mathbb{C} iff and only if A^m = I

The solution given is as follows (functions are applied from the right)

Suppose \rho is a representation of G. Then

I = 1 \rho = ( a^m ) \rho = {(a \rho)}^m = A^m

Conversely assume that A^m = I. Then ( a^i ) \rho = A^i for all integers i.

Therefore for all integers i, j

( a^i a^j ) \rho \ = \ ( a^{i+j} ) \rho \ = \ A^{i+j} \ = \ A^i A^j \ = \ ( a^i \rho ) a^j \rho )

and so \rho is a representation.

===================================================================

That is all fine but I am just getting into representations and wish to get an intuitive understanding of what is happening.

In the above I am suprised that we have no explicit form for A.

Does this mean we have many representations for G in this case - that is any and every matrix A for which A^m = I

Can someone please confirm this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Math Amateur said:
I am reading James and Liebeck's book on Representations and Characters of Groups.

Exercise 1 of Chapter 3 reads as follows:

Let G be the cyclic group of order m, say G = < a : a^m = 1 >.

Suppose that A \in GL(n \mathbb{C} ), and define \rho : G \rightarrow GL(n \mathbb{C} ) by

\rho : a^r \rightarrow A^r \ \ (0 \leq r \leq m-1 )

Show that \rho is a representation of G over \mathbb{C} iff and only if A^m = I

The solution given is as follows (functions are applied from the right)

Suppose \rho is a representation of G. Then

I = 1 \rho = ( a^m ) \rho = {(a \rho)}^m = A^m

Conversely assume that A^m = I. Then ( a^i ) \rho = A^i for all integers i.

Therefore for all integers i, j

( a^i a^j ) \rho \ = \ ( a^{i+j} ) \rho \ = \ A^{i+j} \ = \ A^i A^j \ = \ ( a^i \rho ) a^j \rho )

and so \rho is a representation.

===================================================================

That is all fine but I am just getting into representations and wish to get an intuitive understanding of what is happening.

In the above I am suprised that we have no explicit form for A.

Does this mean we have many representations for G in this case - that is any and every matrix A for which A^m = I

Can someone please confirm this?

well the matrix A isn't the representation, the mapping ρ is. and this mapping doesn't have to be an isomorphism, just a homomorphism. for example, ρ could be trivial, sending every element of G to the identity matrix. or, if m is even, ρ could send a generator of Cm to -I. more generally, with an nxn matrix, there can be many more m-th roots of the identity matrix than you can have in a field. so, yes, representations aren't unique.
 
Thanks

Just needed the confirmation before going onwards!

Thanks again
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top