Representing Chiral cyclohexane on a chair conformation

  • Thread starter Thread starter grewas8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chiral
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, the main focus is on converting a compound's structure into a chair conformation for an organic chemistry assignment. A key question raised is whether equatorial substituents are always represented as wedges in structural diagrams. It is clarified that wedges indicate bonds pointing toward the observer, while dashed lines indicate bonds pointing away, and these representations are not directly tied to axial or equatorial placements. For those struggling with visualizing 3D structures, building a molecular model is recommended as it significantly aids in understanding the spatial arrangement of atoms, making it easier to approach the problem effectively.
grewas8
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
For an assignment for organic chem the question asks to convert the structure of a compound into a chair conformation
my question is that are equatorial substituents always the ones that are represented as a wedge on a structural diagram?
If not could someone please give me tips on how to approach this question?
thanks
P.S. the diagram of the molecule is attached and thick black line represents wedge, thin red line represents dash
 

Attachments

Chemistry news on Phys.org
Bonds that are depicted as wedges are drawn to indicate that the bond is pointed toward the observer. Dashed ones are pointed away from the observer. They are entirely unrelated to chair/boat or axial/equatorial placements per se. If I had little experience visualizing structures in 3D I would approach this problem by building a model. It is very difficult to explain the structure without them. It can be done, but it is difficult.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top