Res-Monster Maze: Find Current Through R

  • Thread starter Thread starter STEMucator
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the current through a resistor in a circuit with multiple resistors and batteries, each with specified values. The user identifies two loops in the circuit and sets up loop equations using Kirchhoff's laws. They propose finding the equivalent resistance for a parallel resistor combination to simplify the calculation. After applying the loop equations, they derive the current through the resistor as 2 A. The solution appears to be confirmed as correct by other participants in the discussion.
STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



Res-monster maze. In the following figure, all the resistors have a resistance of ##4.0 \Omega## and all the (ideal) batteries have an emf of ##4.0 V##. What is the current through resistor ##R##?

Homework Equations



##\sum V = 0##
##\sum I = 0##
##V = \epsilon##
##V = IR##

The Attempt at a Solution



See the attached image.

When I look at it, I see two loops. The big loop to the left of ##R## and the smaller loop to the right of it. Would I just apply the equations in that sense?

Left loop:

##\epsilon_1 - i_1R - i_2R' - i_3R'' = 0##

Right loop:

##\epsilon_2 - i_4R''' + i_5R = 0##

EDIT: Wait what if I just find an equivalent resistance for that one standout parallel resistor combination?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-07-29 at 10.11.12 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-07-29 at 10.11.12 PM.png
    10.1 KB · Views: 894
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The easy way is to see whether there exists a string of nothing but pure voltage sources between one end of R and its other end. Any other method will be many orders of magnitude more complicated. :wink:

You know how to play snakes-and-ladders, right?
 
  • Like
Likes Eashan Roy and STEMucator
NascentOxygen said:
The easy way is to see whether there exists a string of nothing but pure voltage sources between one end of R and its other end. Any other method will be many orders of magnitude more complicated. :wink:

You know how to play snakes-and-ladders, right?

I attached a picture of what I think you mean.

Writing the loop equation now:

##iR + \epsilon_1 - \epsilon_2 - \epsilon_3 - \epsilon_4 = 0##
##i = \frac{- \epsilon_1 + \epsilon_2 + \epsilon_3 + \epsilon_4}{R}##
##i = \frac{8.0 V}{4.0 \Omega}##
##i = 2 A##
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-07-30 at 12.30.28 AM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2014-07-30 at 12.30.28 AM.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 1,419
Zondrina said:
I attached a picture of what I think you mean.

Writing the loop equation now:

##iR + \epsilon_1 - \epsilon_2 - \epsilon_3 - \epsilon_4 = 0##
##i = \frac{- \epsilon_1 + \epsilon_2 + \epsilon_3 + \epsilon_4}{R}##
##i = \frac{8.0 V}{4.0 \Omega}##
##i = 2 A##

That looks right.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top