Research Job Interview Q's: Find the Perfect Candidate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concerns surrounding letters of recommendation (LORs) for research roles and the anxiety candidates experience regarding their selection. Participants emphasize that individual professors have unique perspectives, and there is no universal standard for what they seek in LORs. One contributor expresses worry about excessive focus on uncontrollable factors, suggesting that candidates should concentrate on their studies instead. The conversation highlights that while professors may have different criteria, there are common elements they generally consider. A referenced case illustrates that even well-informed professors can misjudge committee decisions, reinforcing the idea that candidates should apply to multiple schools to mitigate uncertainty. Overall, the key takeaway is to focus on what candidates can control and to diversify their applications.
Physics news on Phys.org


Why do you care? You're not going to be writing your letters. You're not even going to be reading your letters.

Different letters say different things, and different people react differently to what they read. There is no "generic professor" - individuals are all different.

Simfish, I am beginning to worry about you. You are spending an inordinate amount of time fretting about things that are beyond your control. You would be much, much better served devoting this energy to your studies.
 


Why do you care? You're not going to be writing your letters. You're not even going to be reading your letters.

Different letters say different things, and different people react differently to what they read. There is no "generic professor" - individuals are all different.

That's definitely true. But I do have a general idea of what each professor has seen of me, so this will affect which profs i ask for LORs from.

Certainly all professors are different - but there are some common things they generally look for.

Simfish, I am beginning to worry about you. You are spending an inordinate amount of time fretting about things that are beyond your control. You would be much, much better served devoting this energy to your studies.

While I agree that this was definitely true for me 5 months ago, I've devoted the vast majority of my energy into my studies (again) for the last 3 months. The amount of time I spend worrying/posting here is really a small fraction of what I put into my studies these days.
 


Good. That additional studying will serve you well.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=500382" discusses a case where a professor - someone with full access to every applicant's packet and knows each member of the committee personally - didn't guess correctly what the committee would decide. You aren't going to get someone more informed than that. That's why the right strategy is to stop fretting about things that are beyond your control and to apply to multiple schools.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Ah yes - definitely true - thanks very much for that thread!
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top