Resistance of a wire with changing radius

brainslush
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The radius r of a wire of length L increases according to r = a * exp(bx^2), x is the distance from one end to the other end of the wire. What is the resistance of the wire?

Homework Equations


R =\frac{L * \rho}{A}

The Attempt at a Solution


dR =\frac{dx * \rho}{A}

A(r) = \pi * r^2

r(x) = a* e^{bx^2}

A(x) =\pi a^2 * e^{2bx^2}

R =\int^{L}_{0}\frac{\rho}{\pi a^2 * e^{2bx^2}}*dx

Two questions
First of all. Is this approach correct? And second, how does one integrate an errorfunction? (Of course one can use WolframAlpha but how does one get this solution?)
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that A is a function of r when you try to work out dR
 
Of course, A is a function of r but r is also a function of x. Therefore the substitution yields what I have written above. Or am I wrong?
 
R =\frac{x \rho}{A}=\frac{x \rho}{\pi r^2}=\frac{x \rho}{\pi a^2 e^{2bx^2}}

Are you sure your expression for dR is correct?
 
Our professor just told us that r = a * exp(b*x) and i found the mistake... A is dependent on r and therefore I need to consider this in my calculations...

dR = \rho d(\frac{L}{A})

d(\frac{L}{A}) = \frac{dL}{A} - \frac{L*dA}{A^2}

dA = 2*\pi*r*dr , dL = dx

dr = a*b*e^{bx} dx

dR =\rho \int^{L}_{0} (\frac{e^{-2bx}}{\pi*a} - \frac{2*x*b*e^{-2*b*x}}{\pi*a^2})dx
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top