Resistance of Wires: 2L & A vs 2a & A

  • Thread starter Thread starter chicagobears
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wire
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on comparing the resistance of two wires, one with a uniform cross-sectional area (Wire 1) and another that tapers from a larger area to a smaller one (Wire 2). The resistance formula R = kL/A is applied, but the challenge lies in calculating the resistance of Wire 2 due to its varying cross-section. Participants note that without calculus, it's difficult to determine the exact resistance of Wire 2, especially since its shape is not clearly defined. The assumption that Wire 2 resembles a truncated cone allows for some calculations, but the ambiguity in the question complicates a straightforward answer. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for clarity in problem statements to facilitate effective problem-solving.
chicagobears
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two wires both 2L. Wire 1 has a cross sectional area of A. Wire 2 cross sectional area starts at 2a but gradually gets thinner till it is A. Both have the same resitivity constant. Which one has more resistance?


Homework Equations


R=kL/A


The Attempt at a Solution


since constants the same I started with just l/a. Wire one has 2l/a resitivity, but for wire twos have no clue on how to solve for it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks. However, is their any way to do this without calculus? I understand what it is saying but my class is mainly comprised of pre-calculus students witha few calculus students like me. Is their even a way to do this without calculus?
 
The question simply asks which has more resistance, not the exact answer. So you can use a reasonable argument, if you want to avoid doing the actual calculation.
 
Yeah but I kinda want to know how to solve it
 
hmm, I can only think of using calculus. There is no other way I know to get the exact answer.

Also, the question says "Wire 2 cross sectional area starts at 2a but gradually gets thinner till it is A." And wukunlin has taken this to mean that the wire is a truncated cone. This is the most simple, and most likely possibility. But we don't actually know what the exact shape is. So the question is too vaguely worded to be solved anyway. It is only when we make the assumption about the shape, then it can be solved.
 
that pdf i linked actually did all the calculus for you, the result is

R = \frac{ \rho l }{ \pi r_1 r_2 }

where as the typical cylindrical wire gives you

R = \frac{ \rho l }{ \pi r^2 }



you can think of it this way, cut the resistor into tiny little sections, each section will have a portion of the original resistor. when all the section's resistances are added together you get the original resistance. If you cut the resistors into so many sections that the one with varying cross section effective turn into bits of cylinders with different widths, what will be their individual resistance be like comparing to the cylindrical resistor if you cut it into sections that are equally fine?
 
Back
Top