Resistor Math Problem: Finding Equivalent Resistance in Series and Parallel

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ithryndil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistors
AI Thread Summary
Two resistors in series have an equivalent resistance of 744.7 Ω, while in parallel, their equivalent resistance is 130.4 Ω. To find the resistance of each resistor, the equations for series and parallel configurations are applied. The first equation gives R1 = Reqs - R2, which is substituted into the parallel equation. The resulting quadratic equation can be solved for R2, leading to two real solutions, confirming the calculations are correct. Utilizing a calculator program for solving quadratics can help avoid input errors and streamline the process.
Ithryndil
Messages
142
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two resistors connected in series have an equivalent resistance of 744.7 Ω. When they are connected in parallel, their equivalent resistance is 130.4 Ω. Find the resistance of each resistor.
Ω (small resistance)
Ω (large resistance)


Homework Equations


Req = R1 + R2 for Series.
1/Req = 1/R1 + 1/R2 for Parallel.



The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I began by solving one for R1 and plugging it into the other...

If I solve the first one I get R1 = Req - R2. Let's call Req, Reqs for Equivalent Resistance in series. Let's call Reqp the Equivalent Resistance in parallel.

So I plug into the other one:

1/Reqp = 1/ (Reqs - R2) + 1/R2

Messing around I am able to get:
R2Reqs - R2^2 = Reqs*Reqp However when I graph if there is no sign change... I've done it a few times so I don't think it's my algebra.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Try to solve the quadratic equation.
It seems OK to me. Actually I've solved it and it has two real solutions.
You did OK.
Good luck.
 


Hey,
yeah when i used quadratic eq. it seemed to work out fine.

I learned resistors with the equation (R1*R2)/(R1+R2) which is the same thing simplified, but i always find htis one easier.

Anyway, it seems like you just about had it, just needed to finish it off with the eq and you would have it.
 


Ithryndil said:

Homework Statement


Two resistors connected in series have an equivalent resistance of 744.7 Ω. When they are connected in parallel, their equivalent resistance is 130.4 Ω. Find the resistance of each resistor.
Ω (small resistance)
Ω (large resistance)

Homework Equations


Req = R1 + R2 for Series.
1/Req = 1/R1 + 1/R2 for Parallel.

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I began by solving one for R1 and plugging it into the other...

If I solve the first one I get R1 = Req - R2. Let's call Req, Reqs for Equivalent Resistance in series. Let's call Reqp the Equivalent Resistance in parallel.

So I plug into the other one:

1/Reqp = 1/ (Reqs - R2) + 1/R2

Messing around I am able to get:
R2Reqs - R2^2 = Reqs*Reqp However when I graph if there is no sign change... I've done it a few times so I don't think it's my algebra.

Your equation is ok, but you need to solve the quadratic, and since the 4ac term is positive you should have a real result.
 


Bah, it must have been a stupid graphic error on my calculator. I knew I needed to solve the quadratic and must have just goofed when inputting on my calculator to graph and then find where it intersects y = 0. Thanks.
 


I'm guessing that by the way you are talking, you have either a TI-83, or maybe a more advanced. If you are only using an 83 or 84, which is what most people have, there's a very easy quadratic program that you can put in there, (like write yourself) so you don't even need a cord to hook it up to your PC. I made one for mine, and it really comes in handy, because not only its quicker, but then it lessens any stupid mistakes you might make, (like accidently not putting a negative, or having to deal with a window issue for graphing).

So this isn't the exact same as the one i made, but it definately works, just might be one step more than needed. http://www.math.montana.edu/math105/QuadProg.html

Good luck!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top