Resonance absorbtion of neutrons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between neutron flux and temperature in the context of resonance absorption. It clarifies that while flux can be influenced by factors like fuel and moderator materials, the flux spectrum is not easily controlled and is affected by the slowing down process of neutrons. The temperature of the moderator, particularly in light water reactors, plays a significant role in the thermal equilibrium of neutrons, impacting resonance absorption. Additionally, the broadening of resonances due to atomic vibrations is linked to fuel temperature, which is influenced by linear power and coolant temperature. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate calculations in nuclear engineering.
oksuz_
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
Hi,

As you may know, the following equation gives the number of neutrons absorbed per cm3/sec in a resonance region.

Faav∫∑a(E) dE

So, it is said in Lamarsh, introduction to nuclear engineering, that Φav depends on temperature. I do not get this because I know that the flux is something we control. Or should we think just whenever we tune the flux, let's say 1 MeV, the ambient temperature affects its energy?

Thank you in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Temperature of what? If neutron temperature, then neutron flux in the resonance region of the material is affected.
 
oksuz_ said:
Fa=Φav∫∑a(E) dE
That's a general equation for absorption over dE.

oksuz_ said:
I do not get this because I know that the flux is something we control. Or should we think just whenever we tune the flux, let's say 1 MeV, the ambient temperature affects its energy?
The flux spectrum is determined by the fissile source, lattice design and moderator type and density. In an LWR, the neutrons are moderated by the coolant (light water), and it is with water, not the fuel, with which the neutrons are more or less in thermal equilibrium. Resonance absorption occurs at energies above the thermal equilibrium of the moderator. The resonances are broadened by the vibration of the atoms, primarily U-238 and Pu-240 (Pu-240 in irradiated fuel), and the vibration is dependent on fuel temperature, which is dependent on linear power and coolant temperature.
Typical neutron energy spectrum - https://www.researchgate.net/figure/259717796_fig2_Fig-2-Neutron-source-spectrum-from-typical-LWR-reactor

Fission neutrons are born with energies in the low MeV range (0.1 to 10 MeV), with a most probable energy slightly below 1 MeV, and a mean about 2 MeV. One should be able to find a fission neutron energy spectrum in Lamarsh.

See also - https://t2.lanl.gov/nis/publications/madland1.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes oksuz_
I believe you are referring to the flux shape near a resonance, and the bounds of the integral should be above and below the resonance.
The high resonance cross section will cause the flux to "dip" and you will get a lower flux corresponding to the peak of the cross section in the resonance.
If you assume a flat flux shape in the resonance region, you will over-estimate the resonance absorption.

It is not quite true that we "control" the flux. We can control certain things, like the fuel material, moderator material, and size of the materials, but we cannot control the flux spectrum with great accuracy. (At least in a reactor.) The flux spectrum will be a result of the slowing down process. I believe you are studying slowing down process by your question.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top