Restoring Force- any suggestions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bcjochim07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Suggestions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the frequency of oscillations for a mass connected between two rubber bands on a frictionless surface. The tension in each rubber band is denoted as T, and the restoring force is calculated using the small angle approximation, leading to the expression 2T(d/L) for the restoring force. This is equated to the spring force, resulting in a derived expression for the spring constant k. The method used to find the frequency is confirmed as correct, emphasizing that it relies solely on the mass and the calculated restoring force. The approach aligns with the principles of simple harmonic motion.
bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object of mass m is connected between two stretched rubber bands of length L. The object rests on a frictionless surface. At equilibrium, the tension in each rubber band is T. Find an expression for the freq. of the oscillations perpendicular to the rubber bands. Assume the amplitude is sufficiently small that the magnitude of the tension remains essentially unchanged.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I tried, but I have no idea if it's right.

I drew a picture, and found that as it oscillates, the tension in each rubber band in the direction perpendicular to the rubber bands is Tsintheta. Using the small angle approximation, I come up with T(d/L) Where d is the distance perpendicular from the original position of the mass. So the total restoring force is 2T(d/L)

and then I set that equal to the restoring force with the spring constant

2T(d/L)=kd and came up with an expression for k and then substuted that into the frequency equation. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your method is completely correct.
Because its simple harmonic motion (i.e. no damping or forcing) all you need to know is the mass (given) and the force - which you found, and looks right.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
898
Replies
11
Views
10K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top