Restoring Forces and Hookes law

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a bungee jumping scenario involving forces and Hooke's law. The original poster describes the situation where a jumper, Kate, steps off a bridge and the bungee cord behaves like an ideal spring once it stretches. The problem involves determining the spring constant k in relation to various parameters such as height, mass, and gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between potential energy and the work done by the bungee cord. There is a focus on the forces acting on Kate at the lowest point of her fall and the implications of balanced versus unbalanced forces. Questions arise regarding the correct expression for the spring constant k and the conditions under which it should be derived.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about force balance and energy conservation. Some have suggested a relationship between potential energy and the work done by the bungee cord, while others are seeking clarification on the implications of Kate's velocity at the lowest point of her fall. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints regarding the idealization of the bungee cord and the assumption of negligible height for Kate compared to the length of the cord. The discussion also notes the exclusion of dissipative forces in the analysis.

Emendez3
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Kate, a bungee jumper, wants to jump off the edge of a bridge that spans a river below. Kate has a mass m, and the surface of the bridge is a height h above the water. The bungee cord, which has length L when unstretched, will first straighten and then stretch as Kate falls.

Assume the following:

* The bungee cord behaves as an ideal spring once it begins to stretch, with spring constant k.
* Kate doesn't actually jump but simply steps off the edge of the bridge and falls straight downward.
* Kate's height is negligible compared to the length of the bungee cord. Hence, she can be treated as a point particle.


Using:

Fsp=Fg=mg
and Fsp=kdelta(s)
where
Fsp= force of spring
m=mass
k=spring constant

i arrived at
k=(mg)/(h-L)

but its wrong it says:
At this lowest point, forces are not balanced. If they were, Kate's momentum would carry her farther down, into the water. She actually has zero velocity at this point, much like a thrown ball does at the top of its trajectory.
But i don't know what that means
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Emendez3 said:
Kate, a bungee jumper, wants to jump off the edge of a bridge that spans a river below. Kate has a mass m, and the surface of the bridge is a height h above the water. The bungee cord, which has length L when unstretched, will first straighten and then stretch as Kate falls.

Assume the following:

* The bungee cord behaves as an ideal spring once it begins to stretch, with spring constant k.
* Kate doesn't actually jump but simply steps off the edge of the bridge and falls straight downward.
* Kate's height is negligible compared to the length of the bungee cord. Hence, she can be treated as a point particle.


Using:

Fsp=Fg=mg
and Fsp=kdelta(s)
where
Fsp= force of spring
m=mass
k=spring constant

i arrived at
k=(mg)/(h-L)

but its wrong it says:
At this lowest point, forces are not balanced. If they were, Kate's momentum would carry her farther down, into the water. She actually has zero velocity at this point, much like a thrown ball does at the top of its trajectory.
But i don't know what that means

What is the question? Find k in terms of H,L,m,g?
 
LowlyPion said:
What is the question? Find k in terms of H,L,m,g?

oh, If Kate just touches the surface of the river on her first downward trip (i.e., before the first bounce), what is the spring constant k? Ignore all dissipative forces.
Express k in terms of L, h, m, and g.
 
Emendez3 said:
oh, If Kate just touches the surface of the river on her first downward trip (i.e., before the first bounce), what is the spring constant k? Ignore all dissipative forces.
Express k in terms of L, h, m, and g.

Well think about it then.

When she jumps she has m*g*h in PE. And when she falls the bungee doesn't begin to retard her until she has fallen L.

So that means that the work done by the bungee to just stop her at h below the top must be

m*g*h = 1/2*k*(h-L)2
 
LowlyPion said:
Well think about it then.

When she jumps she has m*g*h in PE. And when she falls the bungee doesn't begin to retard her until she has fallen L.

So that means that the work done by the bungee to just stop her at h below the top must be

m*g*h = 1/2*k*(h-L)2

Oh ok Thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
34K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K