Resultant Velocity of a Projectile

AI Thread Summary
An archer shoots an arrow horizontally at 90 m/s from a height of 20 m, taking 2 seconds to reach the target, which is 180 m away from the cliff base. The resultant velocity at impact is calculated using the horizontal component of 90 m/s and the vertical component of 19.6 m/s, resulting in a total velocity of 92.1 m/s. The angle of impact with the vertical is determined to be 77.7°. Key assumptions include neglecting air resistance and considering uniform gravitational acceleration. The discussion emphasizes the importance of resolving the projectile's motion into horizontal and vertical components to find the resultant velocity and angle.
malti001
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An archer stationed at the edge of a cliff shoots an arrow horizontally at 90ms^-1. The arrow falls down and hits a target. Assuming that the arrow is shot from a height of 20m, calculate:

i. How long it takes the arrow to reach the target. (done)
ii. How far horizontally the target is from the base of the cliff. (done)
iii. The resultant velocity at impact and the angle this makes with the vertical. Mention one assumption made.

Homework Equations



SUVAT equations:

436357594271ec28379aa9b0e6342b5a.png


The Attempt at a Solution



Parts i. and ii. were basically tackled by splitting the problem in half via resolving components vertically and horizontally. Time taken for the arrow was found to be 2s and the target was found to be 180m away from the base of the cliff.

What confuses me in part iii. is the assumption I have to make. I know that resultant velocity is the resultant vector from the horizontal and vertical components, and that the angle is found by resolving the vector diagram.

Am I missing something obvious? Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're doing it right bro..
Maybe by the 'assumptions' they mean some basic assumptions like neglecting resistance by air, uniform gravity, etc.
 
Yeah, negligible air resistance is an assumption. (my physics course doesn't feature air resistance at all) But how is this going to help me in finding the resultant velocity at impact?
 
Well there's no horizontal acceleration, so you can take the final horizontal velocity to be 90 m/s.

You can take the final vertical velocity to be ##\vec{a} Δt##.

The resultant velocity would then be : ##\vec{v}_R = \sqrt{ (v_{F_V})^2 +(v_{F_H})^2 }##

Then to get the direction, make your triangle.
 
I think I get it now. The only acceleration present is the downward acceleration due to gravity so obviously the horizontal acceleration would be 0.

Since impact occurs when t=2s, I made a triangle with 90m/s as the horizontal component and 19.6m/s as the vertical component. This is since after 1s, it's accelerating at 9.81m/s per second and thus after 2s, it becomes 19.6m/s (per second). Resultant Velocity was then worked out to be 92.1m/s and the angle that it makes with the vertical was found out to be 77.7°.

This is better summed up in this diagram (it has different numbers though, but still relevant)

u3l2c1.gif


Does any of the above make sense? Lastly, cheers for helping out guys :)
 
Last edited:
malti001 said:
This is since after 1s, it's accelerating at 9.81m/s per second and thus after 2s, it becomes 19.6m/s (per second).

There seems a small ambiguity in that sentence.
Can you find the resultant velocity and angle with vertical after 1.3 sec?
Just to check if you really got it! :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top