Retarded Potential of Moving Charge

Shinobii
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate \phi_{ret} for a charge moving with constant v, along the x-axis.

2. The attempt at a solution

$$
\phi = q \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{\delta(x' - vt')}{|\vec{r} - \vec{r}'|} dx'.
$$

I then use the Dirac delta relation,

$$
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \delta[f(x)]g(x) = \frac{g(x_o)}{|f'(x_o)|}.
$$

Where x_o is the solution of f(x_o) = 0.

I am not really sure how to do this, except that

$$
\begin{eqnarray}
f(x) &=& x' - vt', \\
g(x) &=& \frac{1}{|\vec{r} - \vec{r}'|}.
\end{eqnarray}
$$

Which results in (I think),

$$
\frac{1}{|\vec{r} - \vec{r}_o|}\frac{-1}{\frac{d(vt')}{dt}}.
$$

Then I suppose I would substitute t' = t - |\vec{r} - \vec{r}_o|/c. Looking at the derivative in the denominator I would get,

$$
v \bigg( 1 - \frac{1}{c}\frac{d}{dt}|\vec{r} - \vec{r}_o| \bigg).
$$

But here is where I get stuck (assuming I have not already made any mistakes).

Ok I was able to reach the final result for the derivative;

$$
-v \bigg( 1 - \frac{v}{c} \frac{(\vec{x} - \vec{x}_o)}{|\vec{r} - \vec{r}_o|} \bigg)
$$

however, I have a pesky -v term multiple to the result! Should I have written the delta as \delta(x' - v't') instead of \delta(x' - vt')?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, I think I figured it out. We are looking at the case where f(x_o) = 0, so we just divide by v.
 
If anyone is keeping track, it turns out I should have been taking the derivative w.r.t x. . . f'(x_o) = \frac{d}{dx}f(x_o). Woops!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top