Retraction in surface of genus g

  • Thread starter Thread starter ForMyThunder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surface
ForMyThunder
Messages
149
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the surface Mg of genus g, let C be a circle that separates Mh' and Mk' obtained from the closed surfaces Mh and Mk by deleting an open disk from each. Show that Mh' does not retract onto its boundary circle C, and hence Mg does not retract onto C.

Hatcher Allen. Algebraic Topology Section 1.2 Problem 9


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

Suppose there was such a retraction. Then we would have that i_*:\pi_1(C)\to\pi_1(M'_h) induced by the inclusion map is injective and that \phi:\pi_1(M'_h)\to\pi_1(M_h) is surjective with kernel i_*(\pi_1(C)). Thus, \pi_1(M'_h)/i_*(\pi_1(C))\cong \pi_1(M_h) and by taking the abelianizations: \mathbb{Z}^{2h-1}\cong\mathbb{Z}^{2h}/\mathbb{Z}\cong\mathbb{Z}^{2h} yielding a contradiction.

Is this correct? I used the assumption that C was a retract of Mh' to say that the fundamental group of C is isomorphic to a subgroup of the fundamental group of Mh'.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, in that last line, \mathbb{Z}^{2h-1}\cong\mathbb{Z}^{2h}/\mathbb{Z} is not necessarily true. But the second isomorphism in that line is implied by the previous line and this leads to the contradiction.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
8K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
8K
3
Replies
137
Views
19K
Replies
46
Views
8K
2
Replies
61
Views
12K
2
Replies
93
Views
14K
2
Replies
52
Views
12K
Back
Top