REU vs. Research at my school & taking classes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decision between pursuing a Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) or staying at the current institution to conduct research and potentially complete a double major in physics and math. The individual enjoys their current research in plasma physics but is uncertain if it aligns with their long-term goals. They face a choice: an REU may offer diverse experiences, while staying could lead to a double major, enhancing their academic credentials. However, the math classes that would be most beneficial for their physics career are electives that do not contribute significantly to a math major. The consensus suggests that research experience is more valuable for graduate school applications than additional math credentials, emphasizing the importance of sustained research projects that could lead to publications or conference presentations. Additionally, self-learning math or auditing classes is proposed as a viable alternative to formal coursework. Overall, the emphasis is on prioritizing research experience to strengthen graduate school applications.
gilmerica5000
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Currently I am doing research with a professor in plasma physics, which I am enjoying, though it isn't what I would like to do in the long run. This summer I am going abroad, but next summer it looks like I will have the choice between applying for an REU (which, of course, I may not get anyway) or staying here, doing research, and taking classes. If I stay here over the summer and take classes, there is a chance that I may be able to complete a double major in physics and math (in addition to my other degree in philosophy), but if I don't stay, I will walk away with a two degrees, one in philosophy and one in physics with a minor in math. So, my question is, for grad school, which looks better and would be more beneficial to me - an REU, or summer research with the potential for getting a double major in physics and math? I feel like at an REU there is at least the potential for doing something different from what I am currently that may interest me more. The other issue to take into consideration is that the math classes I feel would be most beneficial for me as a physicist are math electives, and so do not contribute much to that degree. It seems like if I were to major in math, I would have to cut back on some of the classes I want to take (Elementary Partial Diff Eq or Vector Calculus or Compex Variables) for some classes I don't really want to take (Intro. to Advanced Math or Prob & Stats). So maybe the minor would actually be more advantageous? Although, if I stayed over the summer, even if I didn't go for the major in math, it would give me a chance to take a class like Numerical Analysis, which might be helpful... I'm rambling now, so I'll just stop here. Thanks in advance for your assistance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion I think Research would look much better on a application. After all research is a big part of graduate school, not so much undergraduate mathematics.
 
Paragraphs!

Anyway, I think you should consider that the research you do with the plasma's professor will be somewhat sustained, and you may get more out of a project that you've worked on for longer (say a poster, or even a paper). You're the best judge of that. Also, not sure if you can do this, but if you can work with him through the year (while you're not abroad of course) then that would certainly produce good enough work to get you at a conference at the very least.

Also, why do you want a math degree? You could easily learn it on your own, or if you feel that you do need classes you could simply sit in on them as necessary (without having to jump through the requirements hoops, or worry about grades). Certainly certainly certainly research experience is seen as much more indicative of your potential to complete a Ph.D, and is therefore more beneficial to your graduate application.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top