Reversal of magnetic poles upon migration

AI Thread Summary
A sudden change in the orientation of Earth's magnetic poles is unlikely to have catastrophic consequences for migrating species. Historical evidence shows that species have survived numerous magnetic reversals throughout Earth's history, which typically occur over extended periods, allowing ample time for adaptation. Research indicates that even during significant magnetic field changes, such as a complete reversal, residual magnetic fields would still be present, enabling animals to navigate effectively. Experts believe that the gradual nature of these reversals, spanning hundreds to thousands of years, provides sufficient time for species to adjust, and there is no strong evidence linking these events to mass extinctions. Overall, scientists maintain that migrating species are likely to cope well with changes in the Earth's magnetic field.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Will a sudden change in the orientation of Earth's magnetic poles have catastrophic consequences for migrating species?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
1] They don't tend to be sudden.

2] Migrating species seem to have survived the reversals that have been happening every eon since the dawn of time.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7e/Geomagnetic_late_cenozoic-220x768px.png"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DaveC426913,

You make two good points, but I do not understand the link you provided.

Animals in general have survived, but do migrating species particularly suffer? Are times required for species adaptation to magnetic pole reversals comparable (<,=,>) to the reversals themselves?
 
Interesting arguments toward the end of the article. For now, I'm sold. Here is the pertinent exerpt from the article Evo provided:
Indeed, the researchers I spoke with all thought that organisms would be able to adjust to an acute weakening or even complete reversal of the magnetic field. "My gut reaction is it's not going to have an impact," says Frank Paladino, the Indiana-Purdue University leatherback researcher whose project I was visiting that night in 1993.

History seems to back this up. There is no firm evidence that the many magnetic field reversals that have taken place throughout our planet's history (see When Compasses Point South) have coincided with or triggered extinctions. Reversals take hundreds if not thousands of years to complete, and because for anyone type of animal that represents hundreds or thousands of generations, species have time to accommodate to the change. Moreover, Kirschvink notes that even if the main dipole field were to collapse—an event that can last for up to 10,000 years during a reversal—residual fields 5 or 10 percent as strong as the main field would remain on the surface, and animals would be able to use those quite well for migration.
Let's hope.
 
Loren Booda said:
DaveC426913,

You make two good points, but I do not understand the link you provided.
Sorry, I posted it out of context.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_reversal"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Back
Top