Reverse Composition to find composition of a derivative

ninfinity
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


<br /> I\!f~ f(x+1)=\sqrt{x^2-2x}~~~and~~~g(x)=f(\!\sqrt{x})<br />
<br /> Find: g&#039;(x-1)<br />

Homework Equations


In order to find g&#039;(x-1) I know the following steps have to be taken:
<br /> f(x+1) \rightarrow f(x) \rightarrow f(\sqrt{x}) = g(x) \rightarrow g&#039;(x) \rightarrow g&#039;(x-1)<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


Composing ##\sqrt{x}## into ##f(x)## isn't hard, given that I have ##f(x)##. Finding the derivative and then composing ##x-1## into that can also be done without much difficulty.
The only problem that I find myself coming across is how exactly to move from ##f(x+1)## to ##f(x)##. I don't remember any sort of formal equation of something like this, so I started just playing around with it.
I defined ##h(x)=x+1## so that my original equation becomes ##f(h(x))= \sqrt{x^2-2x}##.
Then I tried to logic out what had to be done to ##h(x)## to become ##f(h(x))##. First I decided it needed to be squared. $$h(x)^2 = (x+1)^2 = x^2+2x+1$$It also needs to be taken to a one-half power, but doing that would negate the square, and so something else needs to be happening under the radical.
So I tried $$\sqrt{h(x)^2-1}=\sqrt{(x+1)^2-1}=\sqrt{x^2+2x+1-1}=\sqrt{x^2+2x}$$
Unfortunately, that does not equal ##f(x+1)##.
I happen to be stuck here and cannot figure out how to move forward.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ninfinity said:

Homework Statement


<br /> I\!f~ f(x+1)=\sqrt{x^2-2x}~~~and~~~g(x)=f(\!\sqrt{x})<br />
<br /> Find: g&#039;(x-1)<br />

Homework Equations


In order to find g&#039;(x-1) I know the following steps have to be taken:
<br /> f(x+1) \rightarrow f(x) \rightarrow f(\sqrt{x}) = g(x) \rightarrow g&#039;(x) \rightarrow g&#039;(x-1)<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


Composing ##\sqrt{x}## into ##f(x)## isn't hard, given that I have ##f(x)##. Finding the derivative and then composing ##x-1## into that can also be done without much difficulty.
The only problem that I find myself coming across is how exactly to move from ##f(x+1)## to ##f(x)##. I don't remember any sort of formal equation of something like this, so I started just playing around with it.
I defined ##h(x)=x+1## so that my original equation becomes ##f(h(x))= \sqrt{x^2-2x}##.
Then I tried to logic out what had to be done to ##h(x)## to become ##f(h(x))##. First I decided it needed to be squared. $$h(x)^2 = (x+1)^2 = x^2+2x+1$$It also needs to be taken to a one-half power, but doing that would negate the square, and so something else needs to be happening under the radical.
So I tried $$\sqrt{h(x)^2-1}=\sqrt{(x+1)^2-1}=\sqrt{x^2+2x+1-1}=\sqrt{x^2+2x}$$
Unfortunately, that does not equal ##f(x+1)##.
I happen to be stuck here and cannot figure out how to move forward.

You seem to be over-thinking on the problem. The first task as you said is to find f(x).

You have f(x+1). Replace x with something which can give you f(x).
 
Pranav-Arora said:
You have f(x+1). Replace x with something which can give you f(x).

I don't understand. Replace x with some arbitrary coefficient?
 
ninfinity said:
I don't understand. Replace x with some arbitrary coefficient?

No no. Replace x with something like x+k, which turns x+1 to x.
 
Pranav-Arora said:
No no. Replace x with something like x+k, which turns x+1 to x.

So...it would be something along the lines of f(x+k)=√x2-2x? I'm not making the connection.
 
ninfinity said:
So...it would be something along the lines of f(x+k)=√x2-2x? I'm not making the connection.

Replace x with x+k, you get ##f(x+k+1)=\sqrt{(x+k)^2-2(x+k)}##. What should be k if LHS is to be ##f(x)##?
 
I'll admit I was still a little confused by what you meant, so I decided to try out a few numbers first. At last I tried k=-1 and noticed that inside of the function, f(x+k+1) = f(x) if k=-1, are things like this true for all composition functions and the like?
 
This is obviously a calculus problem, so belongs in the Calculus & Beyond section. I am moving it there.
 
ninfinity said:
I'll admit I was still a little confused by what you meant, so I decided to try out a few numbers first. At last I tried k=-1 and noticed that inside of the function, f(x+k+1) = f(x) if k=-1
Yes, k=-1 is the right choice. So what is ##f(x)## now?

are things like this true for all composition functions and the like?
Yes, they are.
 
  • #10
Mark44 said:
This is obviously a calculus problem, so belongs in the Calculus & Beyond section. I am moving it there.

I apologize for that, since the question was focusing on the algebra of the problem I thought it was best suited for the precalculus section.

Pranav-Arora said:
Yes, k=-1 is the right choice. So what is f(x) now?

$$f(x)=\sqrt{x^2-4x+3}$$
 
  • #11
ninfinity said:
$$f(x)=\sqrt{x^2-4x+3}$$

That's correct. You have f(x) now, do the remaining part.
 
  • #12
Pranav-Arora said:
That's correct. You have f(x) now, do the remaining part.

Then it follows that
$$f(\sqrt{x})=\sqrt{x-4\sqrt{x}+3}=g(x)$$
$$g'(x)=\frac{\sqrt{x}-2}{2\sqrt{x^2-4\sqrt{x^3}+3x}}$$
$$g'(x-1)=\frac{\sqrt{x-1}-2}{2\sqrt{(x-1)(x+2)-4\sqrt{(x-1)^3}}}$$

Those last two functions need to be simplified still further . The problem I am having, however, is that each time I go about this I seem to end up going in circles. I've been thinking about trying to factor using fractional exponents, but I'm not sure if that would get me somewhere useful. Any advice?
 
  • #13
ninfinity said:
Then it follows that
$$f(\sqrt{x})=\sqrt{x-4\sqrt{x}+3}=g(x)$$
$$g'(x)=\frac{\sqrt{x}-2}{2\sqrt{x^2-4\sqrt{x^3}+3x}}$$
$$g'(x-1)=\frac{\sqrt{x-1}-2}{2\sqrt{(x-1)(x+2)-4\sqrt{(x-1)^3}}}$$

Those last two functions need to be simplified still further . The problem I am having, however, is that each time I go about this I seem to end up going in circles. I've been thinking about trying to factor using fractional exponents, but I'm not sure if that would get me somewhere useful. Any advice?

I don't see any terribly useful ways to simplify those. Why do you think you have to simplify?
You could factor a (x-1) out of the terms in the radical in the denominator of the second form but that really doesn't look all that much simpler.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Back
Top