Rewriting the Friedmann Equation

SN_1987A
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a universe with Cold Matter, Radiation, and Dark Energy satisfying an equation of
state p = w\rho.

Variables: p is the pressure of the universe, w is a constant, and \rho is the density of the universe.

a) Show that the Friedmann equation can be rewritten as
H^2(t) = H_0^2(\Omega_{DE}(\frac{a_0}{a(t)})^{3(1+w)} + \Omega_K(\frac{a_0}{a(t)})^2 + \Omega_M(\frac{a_0}{a(t)})^3 + \Omega_R(\frac{a_0}{a(t)})^4)

Variables: H(t)= \frac{\dot{a}}{a} is the Hubble constant, H_0 is today's value of H, a(t) and a_0 are the scale factor at time t and today, respectively, and the Omegas are fractions of the critical density for Dark Energy (DE), Curvature (K), Matter(M), and Radiation (R).

b) For the case w < \frac{-1}{3}, which component of energy density is likely to dominate the early universe? How about the late universe?

Homework Equations



(1) \dot{a}^2 + K = \frac{8 \pi G \rho a^2}{3}
(2) \dot{\rho} = \frac{-3\dot{a}}{a}(p+\rho)
(3) \Omega_K = \frac{-K}{a_0^2 H_0^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



For Part a),

Putting in the given equation for pressure, (2) can be solved to obtain

(4) \rho = \rho_0 \frac{a_0}{a}^{3(1+w)}

where \rho_0 is the current density, which itself is just the sum of the densities of dark energy, matter, and radiation at today's time.

(5) \rho_0 = \rho_{DE0} + \rho_{M0} + \rho_{R0}

Plugging (5) into (4), (4) into (1), and dividing (1) by a^2 yields

(6) H^2 = \frac{8 \pi G}{3} (\rho_{DE0} + \rho_{M0} + \rho_{R0} ) (\frac{a_0}{a})^{3(1+w)} - \frac{K}{a^2}

The current densities are related to their fraction of the current critical densities by

(7) \rho_{i0} = \frac{3H_0^2 \Omega_i}{8 \pi G}
where i is Dark Energy, Matter, or Radiation

Putting (7) into each of the densities in (6), and pulling out a factor of \frac{3H_0^2}{8 \pi G} gives

(8)H^2 = H_0^2 (\Omega_{DE} + \Omega_{M} + \Omega_{R} ) (\frac{a_0}{a})^{3(1+w)} - \frac{K}{a^2}

which, solving (3) for K and putting into (8) gives an answer very close to the solution

(9) H^2 = H_0^2 (\Omega_{DE} + \Omega_{M} + \Omega_{R} ) (\frac{a_0}{a})^{3(1+w)} - \Omega_K (\frac{a_0}{a})^2

Problem
This would get me the desired result if I could choose w as \frac{1}{3} for the radiation term, and 0 for the matter term, which are the values of w that solve radiation and matter dominated universes, respectively, but I don't see how I would be allowed to just simply say "on this term, w is 0, and on this one, it's \frac{1}{3}, and for this one, I'll leave it as w".

My Solution to Part b)

When w < \frac{-1}{3},, using the solution in part a), in the early universe, when \frac{a_0}{a} is large, the Radiation term (largest exponent) will dominate. When \frac{a_0}{a} is approximately 1, the Dark Energy term (which has the largest value of the density fractions), should dominate.

Problem
Explicitly, I haven't been given values of the Omegas, which means I've just tailored an answer to what we know about our universe: radiation dominated while young, dark energy dominated now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But, without knowing the values of the Omegas, this answer might not be generalizable to all w < \frac{-1}{3}.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top