Ricci Tensor from Schwarzschild Metric

Philosophaie
Messages
456
Reaction score
0
Looking for the Schwarzschild Solution for this equation:

ds^2 = -A(r) / c^2 * dr^2 - r^2 / c^2 *(d\\theta^2 +(sin(\\theta))^2 *d\\phi^2) + B(r) * dt^2

where

A(r) = 1 / (1-2*m/r)
And
B(r) = (1-2*m/r)

From this can be calculated the co- and contra-varient metric tensors and Affinity:
g_{ab}
g^{ab}
\Gamma^{c}_{ab}

Ricci Tensor is:

R_{bc} = R^{a}_{bca} = \Gamma^{a}_{dc}*\Gamma^{d}_{ba} - \Gamma^{a}_{da}*\Gamma^{d}_{bc} + d/dx^{c} * \Gamma^{a}_{ba} - d/dx^{a} * \Gamma^{a}_{bc}

My solution is a 4x4 matrix with all zeros except on the diagonal.

My choices for A(r) and B(r) may not be correct for Earth’s orbit and geodesics. Could
someone steer me in the right direction.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand what this means

Looking for the Schwarzschild Solution for this equation,

The Schwarzschild metric is a solution of the GR field equations which has a zero Ricci tensor.

Is your formula as you want it ? dphi should be squared, and it seems to be missing a '+' also.
 
My calculations included the squared term just a typo:

ds^2 = -A(r) / c^{2} * dr^{2}-r^{2} / c^{2} *(d\theta^{2} + (sin(\theta))^{2} *d\phi^{2}) + B(r) * dt^{2}
 
OK. I think you've got A(r) and B(r) switched. All the Ricci components should be zero.
I've just seen another possible error. To contract the Riemann tensor to the Ricci, indexes 1 and 3 are summed over. You are showing contraction over the first and last.
 
The Schwarzschild metric was taken directly from a textbook and confirmed from many websites. My calculations of the metric tensors and affinity are from the Schwarzschild metric. I switched the indices for the Ricci Tensor is summed from the Riemann 1st and 3rd indices and the Ricci tensor was not all zeros with nonzero on the diagonal.

R_{bc} = R^{a}_{bac}

produces the same result because of symmetry

R_{bc} = R^{a}_{bca} = R^{a}_{bac}

What is the rank of this operation?
 
Last edited:
Hi,
please have a look at this thread, and the PDF file there which has the curvature results.

You aren't calculating the metric tensor - that is given. I assume you calculated the connections and used them to get the Riemann tensor.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=243517
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top