Ricocheting Bullet (elastic collisions)

AI Thread Summary
A 0.100-kg stone on a frictionless surface is struck by a 6.00g bullet traveling at 350 m/s, which rebounds at a right angle with a speed of 250 m/s. The key confusion arises from visualizing the bullet's trajectory and its rebound direction, as it initially travels horizontally but then bounces off at a right angle. The discussion emphasizes the importance of conserving momentum in both the North-South and East-West directions during the collision. Clarifying the coordinate system helps in understanding the problem, with the bullet's initial and final velocities needing to be defined correctly. Overall, the momentum conservation principle is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
needphyshelp
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


.100-kg stone rets on a frictionless, horizontal surface. A bullet of mass 6.00g, traveling horizontally at 350 m/s, strikes the stone and rebounds horizontally at right angles to its original direction with a speed of 250 m/s. (a) Compute the magnitude and direction of the velocity of the stone after it is struck.


Homework Equations


Kfinal=Kinitial
Pfinal=Pinitial


The Attempt at a Solution


My problem with this question is that I cannot visualize it so I do not know how to try and solve it. I am confused because the bullet is initially traveling horizontally, but then is rebounding horizontally but at a right angle to the horizontal...? I thought it was just giving me the x-component of velocity for the bullet, but wouldn't the situation described be vertical?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It bounces off horizontally,
Picture it coming in from the north, hitting a 45degree angle face of the stone and bouncing off going east.

The important point is that the total momentum in each direction (eg North-South and East-West) must be the same before and after.
 
If it is coming from the north, wouldn't it be coming in with a vertical velocity? Or is this just a matter of defining axes?
 
North as on a map.
Or if you prefer imagine a flat piece of graph paper where the bullet is coming down the y-axis and bounces off up the x-axis.
 
Last edited:
ohhhhhh. that makes sense.
thank you so much for your quick reply!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top