Riemann Hypothesis for dynamical systems

Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the link. should be an interesting link.

Yet for the facts that the input to the function is based upon a right angle intersection of the real to imaginary being the input to the zeta function, output to the S plane directly related to this.
This of course being the output of zeros being on the r,i plane from the s plan, and the non trivial zeroes being such that they are every negative even integer.
It should be easy for people to see that the non trivial zeros are as a right angle to the real line. For that mater it should be easy for people to see due to input method that a variation of the trivial zeros (which does not exist) would have to result for a non trivial zero to be of the real part line of 1/2.
It is a built in given of the input.

Writing a proof to show this... LOL good luck, yet it does show the intuitive reasoning of RH.
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
554
Replies
163
Views
26K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top