Right Hand rule-Why is it possible

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolfhound25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    hand
AI Thread Summary
The right hand rule is not merely a convention but a mnemonic that reflects the inherent relationship between electric current and the resulting magnetic field. Charged particles moving near a current-carrying wire experience a force dictated by the magnetic field's direction, which is determined by experimental observations rather than arbitrary decisions. While the definitions of positive charge and magnetic field direction are assigned, the resulting interactions are governed by natural laws. The right hand rule serves as a practical tool to remember these interactions, rather than an arbitrary choice. Understanding this connection is crucial for comprehending electromagnetic behavior.
wolfhound25
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I understand that the right hand rule is a convention to give the movement of charged particles around a current carrying wire, but why is it possible to have a standard convention? Why can't the charge particles move either way? Why does the movement of particles in that direction cause that specific magnetic field?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
By fiat.
 
"I understand that the right hand rule is a convention to give the movement of charged particles around a current carrying wire,"
I'm not sure that this is what a right hand rule says.
If charged particles are moving near a current carrying wire, they will experience a force due to the magnetic field around the wire. The direction of that force will depend on the direction in which they are already moving. The force will then modify their motion, but I don't see any simple RH rule for it.

Are you perhaps thinking of the magnetic field caused by the wire?

I wouldn't call the right hand rule "a convention". It is just an aid to remembering what happens.
A convention is usually an arbitrary decision, like taking "up" as the positive direction in a calculation, or saying current flows from positive to negative, or magnetic field is directed from a N pole to a S pole. Once the arbitrary decisions about the direction (sense) of current and field had been made, then the connection between them is determined by nature. That's the way it is.

The magnetic field caused by movement of charge is always in this direction - that is an experimental observation. We could not just say it was the opposite way - we would just be wrong! We just have to remember that is the way it is.
 
Last edited:
My answer is more or less the same as Merlin's, but perhaps with a different emphasis.
Physicists define positive charge arbirarily and direction of magnetic field lines arbitrarily. Having mode those assignments, the right hand rule is an observed fact connecting them.
(Don't confuse this with the right hand rule for vector products, which is an arbitrary convention.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top