Right Hand Thumb Rule: Maxwell's Conclusions

  • Thread starter Thread starter sambarbarian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    hand
AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's conclusion about the direction of the magnetic field, represented by the right-hand thumb rule, arises from vector mathematics and the use of a right-handed coordinate system. This rule serves as a learning tool rather than a physical necessity, as the direction of magnetic field lines is ultimately an arbitrary convention. The choice of coordinate system influences calculations but does not alter the underlying physics. The magnetic field is a representation of components of the electromagnetic tensor, with its direction being a convenient label rather than a reflection of actual movement. Understanding this relationship is crucial, especially when extending theories to higher dimensions.
sambarbarian
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
how did maxwell arrive at the conclusion that the direction of magnetic field is the way our fingers curl , with thumb in direction of current ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition of the direction of magnetic field lines is an arbitrary convention (like the technical current direction, too). You could use the left hand and say "ok, magnetic field lines go from south to north". You would have to modify the sign in some equations, but it would work.
 
sambarbarian said:
how did maxwell arrive at the conclusion that the direction of magnetic field is the way our fingers curl , with thumb in direction of current ?

Its a consequence of the vector mathematics. The right hand thumb rule is just a learning tool to describe that part of the mathematics. I doubt Maxwell was holding his right hand out while trying to understand things, although its possible if he learned vector calculus that way (although he helped develop the math as we know it today).
 
so , we cannot be sure which direction the field is taking ?
 
It is a matter of definitions, not physics. In particular, it is the result of using a right-handed coordinate system, where (1,0,0)x(0,1,0)=(0,0,1), the three vectors pointing, respectively, in the direction of a human's index finger,middle finger,and thumb.

As with any coordinate system, the choice does not affect reality, but it does affect our own calculations .
 
If the magnetic field is pointing north, that doesn't mean that there is actually some real substance that is moving or facing north (and not south). The magnetic field is actually just one way of representing three components of the electromagnetic tensor. Indeed, the x component of the magnetic field is associated with the y-z or z-y component of the electromagnetic tensor, because it is associated with current in the y-z or z-y plane. It doesn't really have anything to do with the x direction. x is just a convenient label because in 3 dimensions, x is "dual" to yz and y is "dual" to xz and z is "dual" to xy. What this means is there's a 1 to 1 correspondence between vectors in x,y,z space and area elements in xy, xz, yz space.

The cross product is really just a shorthand for this dual space relationship. A similar relationship exists for angular momentum. (Angular momentum in the z direction actually has nothing to do with z; it is motion in the x-y directions). If you want to extend the theory to higher than 3 dimensions, you need to take this into account.
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Why do two separately floating objects in a liquid "attract" each other ?? What if gravity is an emergent property like surface tension ? What if they both are essentially trying to *minimize disorder at the interfaces — where non-aligned polarized particles are forced to mix with each other* What if gravity is an emergent property that is trying to optimize the entropy emerging out of spin aligned quantum bits
Back
Top