Rigid Object Under Torque: Solving for Time and Number of Revolutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter elkedoring
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
A grinding wheel, modeled as a uniform solid disk with a radius of 7 cm and mass of 2 kg, accelerates under a constant torque of 0.6 Nm. The calculations for circular acceleration were initially incorrect, leading to an overestimation of the time to reach the final speed of 1200 rev/min. The correct approach involves using the moment of inertia for a disk, which is I=1/2 MR^2, to accurately calculate the angular acceleration. After correcting the calculations, the time to reach operational speed is determined to be 1.03 seconds. The discussion highlights the importance of applying the correct formulas for torque and angular motion.
elkedoring
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A grinding wheel is in the form of a uniform solid disk of radius 7cm and mass 2kg. It starts from rest and accelerates uniformly under the action of the constant torque of 0.6 Nm the motor exerts on the wheel. a) How long does the wheel take to reach its final operational speed of 1200 rev/min? b) Through how many revoulutions does it turn?



Torque= (m*r^2)*circular accel.
circular veloc. Final= circ.veloc. Intial + circular accel.*time




Ok, so I tried to use the above torque equation to solve for circular acceleration. So, .6/(2*.07^2) = circular accel.= 61.22 rad/s. Then I tried putting that value back into the other equation. So, 125.66 rad/s(I converted it)-0=61.22*t. Thus, t=2.06s. However, the time I am supposed to get is 1.03s (half of what I got). Could someone please explain where I went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the equation for torque is \tau=I\alpha, and for a disk rotating about its axis, I=\frac{1}{2}MR^2.

i think that should solve your problem. cheers
 
Thank you that solved the problem!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top