Rings- units, nilpotents, idempotents

  • Thread starter Thread starter missavvy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings Units
missavvy
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the units, nilpotents and idempotents for the ring R =
[\Re \Re]
[0 \Re]

(Those fancy R's are suppose to be the set of Reals by the way.. not good with this typing math stuff)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not actually sure I understand the ring itself. So it is a matrix with entries \Re in the 1-1, 1-2, 2-2 positions and 0 in the 2-1 position..
So is it the entire set of the real numbers?? :S

Anyways for the units, I said all elements are units except for when \Re=0.

But then again I wasn't sure if I'm suppose to use the entire set as those positions, or is it just random numbers from the reals? like a,b,c. OR is it just any number from the reals, but each position has the same #, say x belonging to the reals?

Eughh.. just clarification on the actual question I guess is what I need some help with.

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's got to be just all matrices [[a,b],[0,c]] where a, b, and c are real numbers. It's your 'random numbers from the reals' theory. Where can you go from there?
 
ok well for the units I'm attempting to solve some systems of equations..
[[a,b],[0,c]]*[[a',b'],[d',c']] = [[1,0],[0,1]]
and
[[a',b'],[d',c']]*[[a,b],[0,c]] = [[1,0],[0,1]]

but for matrices, isn't everything invertible whose det is not 0?
 
missavvy said:
ok well for the units I'm attempting to solve some systems of equations..
[[a,b],[0,c]]*[[a',b'],[d',c']] = [[1,0],[0,1]]
and
[[a',b'],[d',c']]*[[a,b],[0,c]] = [[1,0],[0,1]]

but for matrices, isn't everything invertible whose det is not 0?

Sure, if det is nonzero then the matrix is invertible. All you have to show is that the inverse is also in the ring.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top