Solve RL Circuit Equation: Kirchhoff's Rule Explained

AI Thread Summary
In a circuit with a resistor R and an inductor L, the correct application of Kirchhoff's law leads to the equation Ldi/dt + iR = 0. The voltage across the resistor is given by iR, while the inductor's voltage opposes the change in current, represented by Ldi/dt. To derive the equation, one should consider the direction of current flow and apply Faraday's Law, which relates the change in magnetic flux to the induced electromotive force. This results in the relationship Ldi/dt = -Ri, confirming the correct formulation. Understanding these principles clarifies the behavior of the circuit under the given conditions.
Avichal
Messages
294
Reaction score
0
Suppose a circuit with resistor R and inductor L with no source. I am trying to find kirchhoffs equation for this circuit - I am getting iR -Ldi/dt = 0 as my equation which is apparently wrong. I just cannot understand how do I make equations for such circuits.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Should that be iR + Ldi/dt = 0
 
Yes it should be but I don't get it why. Voltage across resistor is iR and then voltage across inductor decreases by Ldi/dt so iR-Ldi/dt=0
 
Draw your circuit and indicate an (arbitrary) direction, in which you want to count the current positive. Then use the right-hand rule to attach the surface-normal vector oriented positive relative to that direction of the current. Finally use Faraday's Law,
\partial_t \vec{B}=-\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E},
and integrate (line integral) along the circuit in direction of the positve current. Then the left-hand side translates into L \frac{\mathrm{d} i}{\mathrm{d}t} for compact circuits, and the right-hand side you can transform into an integral along the surface, translating into -R i, where we have made use of Ohm's Law, \vec{E}=\vec{j}/\sigma. From this you get the desired equation,
L \frac{\mathrm{d} i}{\mathrm{d} t}=-R i.
 
Sorry I am unaware of some of the things you said. Can you simplify please?
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top