RLC Circuit: Find Applied Source Voltage

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the applied source voltage in an RLC circuit using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL). Initial calculations suggest a total voltage of 110 volts, but concerns arise regarding the phase differences between the capacitor and inductor voltages, which cannot be simply added. The lack of specific resistance and reactance values for the capacitor and inductor complicates the calculations. Suggestions include using a voltage divider equation to relate the voltages and reactances, but without given values, the calculations remain incomplete. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the need for more information to accurately determine the source voltage.
uzair_ha91
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/3048/56893213.jpg
Find the voltage of the applied source.

Homework Equations



I=V/R
Kirchoff's Voltage Law

The Attempt at a Solution



Applying KVL.
V= 40 + 50 +20
=110

Is this question that simple?
Or am I missing something?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The voltages across the capacitor and the inductor don't have the same phase, so you can't add them.
 
But the values of resistance and reactance aren't given for capacitor and inductor, so how should I calculate their voltages?
Or I just can't add them anyway? So how to reach the answer?
 
What if I took them as vectors?
VR = 40
VC = -20i
VL = 50i

V=40+30i
The magnitude of this is sqrt (402 + 302) = sqrt (1600 + 900) = sqrt(2500) = 50 volts
Is this correct?
 
You don't know what the direction of those vectors is.

Use the equation for a voltage divider

V_R = \frac {R} {X}

V_L = \frac {i \omega L } { X}

V_C = ...

where X is the total reactance of the circuit, a complex number that is a
function of \omega R, C and L

now compute the magnitude of V_L/V_R and V_C/V_R

this will give a relation between R and \omega L and \omega C

wich you can substitute in the equation for V_R above.
 
But the values for R and \omega L and \omega C are not given.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top