RMS to Peak Conversion: Magnetic Field Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter spacetime
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conversion of RMS values to peak values in the context of a magnetic field experiment. Typically, RMS values are multiplied by 1.41 (or √2) to obtain peak values for sinusoidal signals. However, the device in question requires multiplying the RMS values by 2.82 (or 2√2), indicating a different calculation method. This adjustment is attributed to specific experimental conditions and the relationship between average and RMS values in the context of the device's operation. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate measurements in the experiment.
spacetime
Messages
119
Reaction score
2
I know that the RMS values need to be multiplied be 1.41 to get peak values, but now we are doing an experiment with magnetic field, there is a device that produces the magnetic field and the manual says we are supposed to multiply RMS values (which this device shows) by 2.82 to get the peak values. Can you please explain how it got doubled?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends specifically on the experiment and some kind of symmetry between the average value and the RMS value that gives you the factor to multiply by.

Note that 1.41 = \sqrt{2} and 2.82 = 2\sqrt{2}[/tex]
 
Thanks, I understand now it's just for sinusoids that 1.41 or \sqrt{2} is the factor.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top