Role of Pipe Length in Poiseuille's Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between pipe length and pressure drop in Poiseuille's Law, specifically how increasing the length of a pipe increases the pressure drop (Delta P). It clarifies that while the fluid is incompressible, this does not imply that pressure drop remains constant; rather, a longer pipe introduces more drag from the walls, necessitating a greater pressure difference to maintain a constant flow rate. Participants emphasize that the pressure drop must counterbalance the drag forces acting on the fluid. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that longer pipes result in increased resistance, requiring higher pressure to sustain flow. Understanding this relationship is crucial for applying Poiseuille's Law effectively.
Willis92
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I can't figure out why the length the a pipe (L) increases the change in driving pressure with respect to this law:

Delta P = (8*mu*L*Q)/(pi*(r^4))

I would think that delta P wouldn't change because the fluid is incompressible.

Does anyone have a conceptual explanation for the simple fact I can't seem to find?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Willis92 said:
I can't figure out why the length the a pipe (L) increases the change in driving pressure with respect to this law:

Delta P = (8*mu*L*Q)/(pi*(r^4))

I would think that delta P wouldn't change because the fluid is incompressible.

Does anyone have a conceptual explanation for the simple fact I can't seem to find?

Thanks in advance.
If you want to hold the volumetric throughput rate Q constant while you increase the length of the pipe, you have to increase the pressure drop. Why do you think that the pressure drop from one end of the pipe to the other end of the pipe wouldn't change if the fluid is incompressible? The incompressibility of the fluid means that its density doesn't change when you change the pressure. That doesn't have any bearing on the pressure drop/flow rate behavior of the fluid.

Chet
 
The longer the pipe the more drag on the fluid from the pipe wall.
 
Ok, so it's just the drag from the pipe wall then? That makes sense.

I got hung up thinking about if you have a certain force pushing an amount of fluid through at a time, the same comes out at the other end, regardless of how far away that end is.

But it makes sense if drag is the only thing preventing that.
 
Yes; when the fluid is flowing at a steady rate, the difference in pressures at either end of the pipe times the cross-sectional area must balance the drag forces from the pipe walls.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top