Rolling Ball Mechanics: Proving Zero Horizontal Force Constraint

Logarythmic
Messages
277
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a homogenous ball constrained to move on a horizontal plane.
Show that when the ball is rolling without slipping on the plane, then the total horizontal force on the ball must be zero.
HINT: Consider the ball as a rigid body and suitably combine the equations describing the rotation with the rolling constraints.


Homework Equations


None


The Attempt at a Solution


None. Been thinking about this for two days so I need a starter please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well a good place to start is with the hint and find out what the equations governing its rolling motion are and the conditions for rolling without slipping. So you can bet there's something to do with friction in there aswell.
 
I'm not that stupid. ;)
 
What exactly are you stuck on then?
 
Logarythmic said:

Homework Statement


Consider a homogenous ball constrained to move on a horizontal plane.
Show that when the ball is rolling without slipping on the plane, then the total horizontal force on the ball must be zero.
HINT: Consider the ball as a rigid body and suitably combine the equations describing the rotation with the rolling constraints.


Homework Equations


None


The Attempt at a Solution


None. Been thinking about this for two days so I need a starter please.

If you assume there is only a frictional force acting, then the statement is easily proven. Friction has to oppose the motion of the ball, so if there is any friction the ball will decelerate. However, if this is the only force acting the torque would produce an angular acceleration in the direction of angular motion, so the rotation rate would increase. This cannot happen if there is no slipping, in which case the rotation rate would have to decrease in proportion to the linear velocity.

A similar argument can be made about the application of a single horizontal force at the top of the ball. There is too much torque for the linear acceleration to keep up with the angular accelration. However, the torque can be reduced by lowering the applied force to a point below the top of the ball, so it is possible to match the angular and linear accelerations to have no slipping with a single horizontal force. The point of application to achieve this would be 2/5 of a radius above center. At lower points still above center, a frictional force can provide additonal torque while reducing the linear acceleration, and no slipping can be achieved with a net force acting and a net accelration.

I assume the problem is more restrictive than the application of the forces applied at arbitrary points, and is talking about a single constraining force like friction applied tangent to the ball.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top