Rolling Motion, a Contradiction

In summary, for a wheel in pure roll with constant angular velocity, the velocity of the point at the top is 2 times the velocity of the center of mass and the velocity of the point at the bottom is 0. However, the centripetal acceleration at the top is found to be v^2/R, which is contradictory to the expected value of \omega^2r. This can be explained by considering the radius of curvature at the top of the wheel to be 4 times the radius of the wheel, which results in a centripetal acceleration of v^2/R. This can also be derived using the equation for radius of curvature and the cycloidal representation. Additionally, it is important to view the acceleration
  • #1
breez
65
0
For a wheel in pure roll, or smooth rolling motion, with constant angular velocity, [tex]\omega[/tex], the velocity of the point on the top of the wheel is [tex]2v_{com}[/tex], and the velocity of the point at the bottom of the wheel is 0. (all relative to the ground)

However, since centripetal acceleration is [tex]\frac{v^2}{R}[/tex], wouldn't that mean the acceleration of the wheel is 0 at the bottom and [tex]\frac{4v_{com}^2}{R}[/tex] at the top? This is contradictory to the fact that if [tex]\omega[/tex] is constant, [tex]a_{centripetal}[/tex] = [tex]\omega^2r[/tex], which should be the same throughout the wheel.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
But v^2/R applies in the reference frame where the center of the circle is at rest.
 
  • #3
The translational velocity of the wheel should then not affect the centripetal acceleration of the wheel correct? Since with the reference frame of the com of the wheel, would be equivalent to a frame with the wheel at rest. Therefore, the observed acceleration in both cases should still be v^2/R?
 
  • #4
to write v^2/R, we should first find R. This R is not the radius of the wheel. The top most point of the wheel follows a cycloidal path. So we should use general equation to find the radius of the trajectory at the top most point. And that comes out to be 4R... So, acceleration at the top most point comes out to be (2v)^2/4R = v^2/R.
So there is no contradiction again.
 
  • #5
How did you derive 4R as the radius at the top? What is the definition of radius of trajectory?
 
  • #7
breez said:
How did you derive 4R as the radius at the top? What is the definition of radius of trajectory?

The radius R of curvature for a twice differentiable curve, parametrized by [tex]\vec{r}(t)=(x(t),y(t))[/tex], is given by the expression:

[tex]\frac{1}{R}=\frac{||\vec{a}\times\vec{v}||}{||\vec{v}||^{3}}, \vec{v}=\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt},\vec{a}=\frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}[/tex]

Use this combined with the cycloidal representation to derive the correct result for the centripetal acceleration in terms of the radius of curvature.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
breez said:
For a wheel in pure roll, or smooth rolling motion, with constant angular velocity, [tex]\omega[/tex], the velocity of the point on the top of the wheel is [tex]2v_{com}[/tex], and the velocity of the point at the bottom of the wheel is 0. (all relative to the ground)

However, since centripetal acceleration is [tex]\frac{v^2}{R}[/tex], wouldn't that mean the acceleration of the wheel is 0 at the bottom and [tex]\frac{4v_{com}^2}{R}[/tex] at the top? This is contradictory to the fact that if [tex]\omega[/tex] is constant, [tex]a_{centripetal}[/tex] = [tex]\omega^2r[/tex], which should be the same throughout the wheel.
As others have explained, if you view the path of a point on the wheel, you can see that its cycloidal path has a radius of 4R at the top (not 2R, or R). But here's another way of viewing things that might prove helpful. What's important to realize is that while the speed of the bottom of the wheel is instantaneously zero with respect to the ground, its acceleration is not.

The top of the wheel is instantaneously in pure rotation about the bottom point. Since its speed with respect to that point is 2v, its centripetal acceleration with respect to that point would be [itex]a = -(2v)^2/(2R) = -2v^2/R[/itex]. But that bottom point is itself accelerating (with respect to an inertial frame); its acceleration is [itex]+v^2/R[/itex]. So the net acceleration of the top of the wheel with respect to an inertial frame is [itex]-2v^2/R + v^2/R = -v^2/R[/itex], as expected.
 
  • #9
how do you say that bottom point of the wheel is accelerating.. According to my calculation, a(radial) is zero as velocity of that point is zero. and a(tangential) is zero as its pure rolling.
 
  • #10
You need to view things from an inertial frame. The center of the wheel is one such frame, since its velocity is constant. All points on the rim of the wheel are centripetally accelerated.
 
  • #11
ah..ok.. i agree to it then.. i was seeing that w.r.t ground
 

FAQ: Rolling Motion, a Contradiction

1. What is rolling motion and how does it differ from other types of motion?

Rolling motion is the combination of translational and rotational motion in an object. It differs from other types of motion, such as linear or rotational motion, because it involves both types of motion simultaneously.

2. Is rolling motion a contradiction?

No, rolling motion is not a contradiction. While it may seem contradictory to have both translational and rotational motion occurring simultaneously, it is actually a result of the shape and structure of the object and the forces acting upon it.

3. Can you provide an example of rolling motion in real life?

Yes, a common example of rolling motion is a wheel or a ball rolling on a surface. As the object moves forward, it also rotates around its axis, exhibiting both translational and rotational motion.

4. Is rolling motion relevant to any scientific fields?

Yes, rolling motion is relevant in several scientific fields, including physics, engineering, and mathematics. It is often used to explain and predict the behavior of objects in motion, and is also important in the design and function of various machines and vehicles.

5. How does friction affect rolling motion?

Friction can have a significant impact on rolling motion. It can either aid in the motion of an object, such as providing traction for a car tire, or it can hinder the motion by opposing the rotational and translational forces. The amount of friction present can also determine the speed and direction of the rolling motion.

Back
Top