Rolling on flat floor, rolling down an inclined plane?

AI Thread Summary
When an object rolls on a flat surface, friction ceases to act when the velocity at the circumference matches the velocity at the center of mass, resulting in no angular acceleration or torque. However, when rolling down an inclined plane, the object experiences angular acceleration due to the gravitational force, which creates torque. This torque necessitates friction to maintain rolling motion, as the point of contact does not remain stationary relative to the inclined surface. Thus, friction is essential for rolling down an incline, unlike on a flat surface. Understanding these dynamics clarifies the role of friction in different rolling scenarios.
applestrudle
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
When rolling on a flat floor when the velocity at the circumference equals the velocity at the centre of mass the friction stops acting right? SO why does't that happen when it is rolling down an inclined plane? If it is rolling shouldn't the point in contact with the inclined plane be stationary relative to the inclined plane (therefore no friction just like on the flat floor)??

Please explain this to me

:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi applestrudle! :smile:
applestrudle said:
When rolling on a flat floor when the velocity at the circumference equals the velocity at the centre of mass the friction stops acting right?

when rolling at constant speed, there is no angular acceleration (and, incidentally, no horizontal linear acceleration)

so there is no torque

so no friction​

(when rolling at constant speed against air resistance and/or against an external frictional torque at the axle, the total torque must be zero, so the friction with the road must be non-zero so as to balance out the air resistance or axle friction:

so you see, the stationaryness of the point of contact is irrelevant)
SO why does't that happen when it is rolling down an inclined plane? If it is rolling shouldn't the point in contact with the inclined plane be stationary relative to the inclined plane (therefore no friction just like on the flat floor)??

when rolling downhill, there is angular acceleration

so there is torque (and the torque of both the weight and the normal force about the centre of mass is zero) …

so there is friction :wink:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top