Rontgen's discovery of x-rays - question

  • Thread starter Thread starter tramar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discovery X-rays
tramar
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
When Rontgen discovered x-rays in 1895, was he witnessing K-shell emission or Brehmsstrahlung radiation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't have a definite answer, but I think I know what you need to look for.

From Yale: An Historical Overview of the Discovery of the X-Ray

From this, it appears that in Röntgen's Lenard tube, the X-rays were produced by cathode rays (electrons) impinging on an aluminum sheet ("window") in the wall of the tube.

If the electron energy is above the K-shell ionization energy for aluminum, then it can kick out a K-shell electron, and you can have K-shell emission.

So you need to find out the K-shell energy for aluminum, and the voltage on Röntgen's Lenard tube (which gives you the energy of the electrons in eV).

Below the K-shell energy, it can be only bremsstrahlung. Above that energy, both processes can take place.

By a strange coincidence, last week, while traveling through Germany, I stood outside the building in Würzburg where Röntgen made his discovery. Unfortunately, the museum inside was closed that day. :frown:
 

Attachments

  • Wuerzburg.jpg
    Wuerzburg.jpg
    46.9 KB · Views: 589
If you look at a typical X ray spectrum you will see that it consists of the discrete K,L etc lines superimposed upon a smoothly varying bremmstrahlung background and that most of the energy emitted is in the form of bremmstrahlung.I think Rontgen called them X rays because he didn't know what they were and so he used X, the symbol for the unknown.
 
Right, in general you have both effects. But if the cathode-ray energy was low enough, then Röntgen would have seen only bremsstrahlung.
 
  • Like
Likes Cool4Kat
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top