Root Locus: 4 Open Loop Poles at s=-2

  • Thread starter Thread starter bill nye scienceguy!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root Root locus
AI Thread Summary
In a system with four open loop poles at s=-2, the root locus approaches the four corners of a square centered at this point as gain K increases. The transformation of the open loop transfer function G(s) = 1/(s+2)^4 to Gc(s) = K/[(s+2)^4 + K] illustrates this behavior. As K increases, the square representing the root locus expands outward, not proportionately. To determine the poles of Gc(s), one must set the denominator to zero and solve for s, which may require understanding the nth roots of unity. This discussion highlights the geometric interpretation of root loci in control systems.
bill nye scienceguy!
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
If have a system with 4 open loop poles, all at say s=-2, how would the locus approach each of the four asymptotes?

thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
are you really the bill nye on the radio? just curious. after looking at your history, i somehow doubt it.

this thing sounds like what happens with a Moog 4-pole Low Pass Filter. once you surround it with a loop and gain, you just solve the new transfer function for the poles and you can see that they move outward from the original place like 4 corners of a square centered at the original location. are you going to make me do the math to show you?
 
unfortunately not, sorry!

anyway, do you mean that the open loop transfer function G(s)=1/(s+2)^4 would become something like Gc(s)=K/[(s+2)^4+K]?
I still can't really visualise what the locus would look like though. Does it just expand outwards from s=-2, following the four asymptotes?
 
bill nye scienceguy! said:
anyway, do you mean that the open loop transfer function G(s)=1/(s+2)^4 would become something like Gc(s)=K/[(s+2)^4+K]?
I still can't really visualise what the locus would look like though. Does it just expand outwards from s=-2, following the four asymptotes?

yes it does. but it's not really asymptotes. the loci of the roots really are the four corners of a square centered at s=-2. as K gets bigger, the square gets bigger (not proportionately). (i am presuming that K is the signed, linear gain in series with G(s) and that the feedback is negative feedback with unity gain.)

G_c(s) = \frac{K G(s)}{1 \ + \ K G(s)} = \frac{K}{1/G(s) \ + \ K}

now, to find the poles of Gc(s), you set the denominator to zero and solve for s. if you are not already familiar with the nth roots of unity (involving complex numbers), you should get that down first.
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top