Rotary air compressor and vortex tubes questions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the specifications and operational characteristics of a micro screw air compressor and its application in powering a vortex tube for cooling purposes. Participants explore various technical aspects, including discharge pressure, specific power, and the relationship between PSI and CFM in the context of compressor performance.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why discharge pressure remains constant across different rotor speeds and power levels, despite increases in horsepower and airflow.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the meaning of "specific power" as defined in the compressor specifications, expressing confusion over its implications.
  • There is a query about the conversion between bar and PSI, specifically if the formula PSI = bar x 14.504 is accurate.
  • Participants discuss the necessity of a pressure tank when using a compressor directly with a vortex tube, questioning if a compressor can sustain pressure without a tank.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the compatibility of a compressor's airflow (CFM) with the requirements of a vortex tube, particularly when the compressor's output is significantly lower than the vortex tube's demand.
  • One participant shares personal experience with vortex tubes, suggesting that high CFM is more critical than PSI for performance.
  • Another participant indicates that they are exploring specific compressor models that meet their cooling application needs, prioritizing low power consumption, pressure sustainability, size, and noise level.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and experience with the topics discussed, leading to multiple competing views on the importance of CFM versus PSI for vortex tube performance. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the technical questions posed, with no consensus reached on the necessity of a tank or the implications of specific power.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding of compressor specifications and operational requirements, particularly regarding the relationships between pressure, airflow, and power consumption. There are also references to specific compressor models and brands, indicating a focus on practical application.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in the technical specifications of air compressors, their application in cooling systems, and the operational requirements of vortex tubes. It may also benefit those exploring the design and performance characteristics of small-scale air compression systems.

rolinger
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello, below are some specs I was provided of a micro screw air compressor, its physical dimensions are 4x4x4 and it seems pretty impressive for its size. However I am trying to understand a few things about the data that was provided.

I am provided 6 charts on power/airflow/psi etc, each chart rates a specific discharge pressure in relation to increased hp and rotor speed and power consumption. The 6 charts are power/airflow/hp specs for: 7.3bar, 8.3bar, 10.3bar, 12.3bar, 14bar and 15bar.

Each chart measures:
A:Tip_Speed B:Rotor_Speed C:Discharge_Pressure D:FAD E:Power F:Specific_Power:

Question 1:
As rotor speed, HP, power and CFM increase, how come the discharge pressure (bar) doesn't increase or decrease accordingly? Chart 1 rates rotor speed at 4,900 RPM thru 22,000 RPM (accordingly power consumption, CFM increase with RPM), but the pressure (bar) remains constant at 7.3bar. How is that everything else increases but the bar stays the same?

Charts 2 thru 6 all reflect the same thing in described in Chart 1 but rated for the different bar measurements, as everything else increases the discharge pressure remains the same (above: 8.3bar,10.3bar,12.3bar,etc).

Question 2: The final column is "specific power" defined as: kw/m3/min. Can someone explain this? To me it looks like kilowatt/meters cubed/minute. If I am correct, then the relationships don't make sense to me, one example is: kw/m3/min=9.514. What does this mean?

Question 3: Is determining PSI is as simple as: PSI = bar x 14.504, so 7.3bar = 105.8 PSI ?

Question 4: Compressors typically have tanks on them to sustain/build pressure. What if a compressor is used without a tank, simply feeding the outlet (discharge pressure) valve directly to the device its meant to power (in this case a vortex tube)? Is a tank required to sustain the pressure or can a compressor that is capable of 100 PSI be able to sustain that pressure on its own, without a tank? The inbound air to the compressor is going to be standard room air pressure.

Question 5: If a compressor is pushing 100 PSI at 2.5CFM, and a vortex tube requires 100 PSI for 20CFM...is the vortex tube going to work to capacity considering the intake PSI is met via the compressor? Because the compressors 2.5CFM is considerably less than the vortex tube's CFM - will there be an impact on the vortex tubes capability?

Thanks for your time and your responses.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
moe in wichita ks
hi iam new here. i think iam going enjoy this site.
i used the tubes you are talking about. in a machine shop. most of these tubes need a LOT air. and don't forget that compresed air is very expenseve. now remember i do not have a higher education, it was all could do to pass high school, and iam a very bad speller. my guess is that you will not get the performance you need. if you could get 17 or 18 cfm you might get by. these tubes need cfm more than psi. good luck.
moe7404@att.net
 
rolinger said:
Hello, below are some specs I was provided of a micro screw air compressor, its physical dimensions are 4x4x4 and it seems pretty impressive for its size. However I am trying to understand a few things about the data that was provided.

I am provided 6 charts on power/airflow/psi etc, each chart rates a specific discharge pressure in relation to increased hp and rotor speed and power consumption. The 6 charts are power/airflow/hp specs for: 7.3bar, 8.3bar, 10.3bar, 12.3bar, 14bar and 15bar.

Each chart measures:
A:Tip_Speed B:Rotor_Speed C:Discharge_Pressure D:FAD E:Power F:Specific_Power:

Question 1:
As rotor speed, HP, power and CFM increase, how come the discharge pressure (bar) doesn't increase or decrease accordingly? Chart 1 rates rotor speed at 4,900 RPM thru 22,000 RPM (accordingly power consumption, CFM increase with RPM), but the pressure (bar) remains constant at 7.3bar. How is that everything else increases but the bar stays the same?

Charts 2 thru 6 all reflect the same thing in described in Chart 1 but rated for the different bar measurements, as everything else increases the discharge pressure remains the same (above: 8.3bar,10.3bar,12.3bar,etc).

Question 2: The final column is "specific power" defined as: kw/m3/min. Can someone explain this? To me it looks like kilowatt/meters cubed/minute. If I am correct, then the relationships don't make sense to me, one example is: kw/m3/min=9.514. What does this mean?

Question 3: Is determining PSI is as simple as: PSI = bar x 14.504, so 7.3bar = 105.8 PSI ?

Question 4: Compressors typically have tanks on them to sustain/build pressure. What if a compressor is used without a tank, simply feeding the outlet (discharge pressure) valve directly to the device its meant to power (in this case a vortex tube)? Is a tank required to sustain the pressure or can a compressor that is capable of 100 PSI be able to sustain that pressure on its own, without a tank? The inbound air to the compressor is going to be standard room air pressure.

Question 5: If a compressor is pushing 100 PSI at 2.5CFM, and a vortex tube requires 100 PSI for 20CFM...is the vortex tube going to work to capacity considering the intake PSI is met via the compressor? Because the compressors 2.5CFM is considerably less than the vortex tube's CFM - will there be an impact on the vortex tubes capability?

Thanks for your time and your responses.

moe7404 said exactly the right thing in answer to Q5.

I have waited to see if someone would answer your questions, and have been surprised at no response, so I looked at your profile and found all your other post, after reading them, my guess is that you are trying to design a cooler for a laptop computer (or any other). If I'm right let me know and I'll throw out some things for you to learn about.

For now I don't have time to answer the questions above, but do have a couple of links that might provide some answers to some of your questions.

http://mems.sandia.gov/scripts/images.asp

Lots of stuff here to spin your brain:approve:


http://www.productivetool.com/pdf/atlascopco/atlascopco.air_motors.pocket_guide.pdf


The air motor guide will answer some of your compression questions, and some of the Power, CFM requirements. The air motor can also be viewed as an air compressor, the same as an electric motor can be a generator.

Study the Sandia site and you can start to understand that going small is not a big thing.:cool:

Ron
 
Thanks for responding, I too was wondering why no one was doing so. I suppose questions 2 & 4 are all I need answered at this point.

My application is really about cooling with a vortex tube, but since that seems to be the easy part, the issue becomes getting the right kind of compressor to power the vortex tube. I am currently looking at compressors from this company: www.elgi.com - mainly at their Rotary air end compressors. Thus far they are the only ones I have found who make a compressor that meets my needs, or comes close to it. However, they are quite expensive...retailing over $400 US. Though, it still might be the best bang for the buck considering the units size versus output versus cost.

I went through a spell where I was attempting to make my own compressor but that was a fruitless endeavor. However, I do have specific needs that are prioritized as follows:

1. low power consumption (0.1 to 0.2 kW)
2. can sustain 80-120 PSI (question #4?)
3. physical size - smaller footprint the better
4. noise level - how quiet can it be

Now that I know CFM from the compressor (not just PSI) greatly affects the performance of a vortex tube, I suppose CFM should be on that list too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K