I Rotating Molecules: Energies, Angular Momentum & Wavefunctions

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter kelly0303
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecules Rotation
kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33
Hello! I am a bit confused about the rotational motion in molecules. Assuming the bond length is constant, the motion can be described as a rigid rotor. In the center of mass frame the energies are given by ##BJ(J+1)## and the wavefunctions are spherical harmonics. However when we measure the energies or the angular momenta, we do it in lab frame. So I am a bit confused. Is the formula for the energy the same both in lab and CM frame? And if not, what is the formula in the lab frame? Also, is the wavefunction the same in both frames or, in other words, is the angular moment of the molecule the same in both frames. Actually I am a bit confused about how is the angular momentum defined in the CM frame. Isn't the molecule stationary in that frame? Yet the wavefunctions in the CM frame (spherical harmonics) do show a clear angular momentum dependence. Can someone help me clarify these things? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kelly0303 said:
However when we measure the energies or the angular momenta, we do it in lab frame. So I am a bit confused. Is the formula for the energy the same both in lab and CM frame? And if not, what is the formula in the lab frame?
Should the energy be frame dependent?

kelly0303 said:
Also, is the wavefunction the same in both frames or, in other words, is the angular moment of the molecule the same in both frames.
The wave function is the wave function and is independent of any representation. However, its mathematical expression will differ dependent on the choice of representation (just like for the comparison between its representation in momentum space compare to position space).

kelly0303 said:
Actually I am a bit confused about how is the angular momentum defined in the CM frame. Isn't the molecule stationary in that frame?
No, because what you separate is the translation of the center of mass. You then get a Hamiltonian corresponding to the relative displacement of the atoms (vibrations) and the overall orientation of the molecular frame (rotations).

Note that there are three rotational quantum numbers: the total angular momentum ##J##, the projection of the total angular momentum on the z axis is the lab frame, ##M_J##, and the projection of the total angular momentum on the z axis is the molecule frame, ##K##. (The latter is not used for linear molecules, such as diatomic molecules, where only ##K=0## is possible.)
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top