Rotating steel wire with bead on it

AI Thread Summary
A bead with a mass of 100 g slides along a rotating semicircular steel wire of radius 10 cm, rotating at 2 revolutions per second. The discussion focuses on the forces acting on the bead, including centripetal force, gravity, and the normal force. It is clarified that the bead cannot remain motionless relative to the wire due to the absence of an upward force component, leading to acceleration. The forces must be resolved into components to determine the conditions for the bead's motion. A visual representation is suggested to better understand the forces involved.
mrdoe
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A small bead with a mass of 100 g slides without friction along a rotating semicircular steel wire, where the semicircle has radius 10cm. The steel wire rotates about a vertical axis at a rate of 2 revolutions per second. Find the positions at which the bead will be motionless relative to the rotating steel wire, if the bead is in the lower half of the semicircle. Gravity points in the direction of the steel wire's axis. All surfaces are frictionless.

2. The attempt at a solution

We have the centripetal force which is in the horizontal direction to the left, which is $\dfrac{mv^2}{r} = 16000\pi^2$. We also have the velocity in the forwards direction, which is not accelerating (?) so there's no force, right? We also have the combined force of gravity and the normal force, which is $100g\sin\theta$, where $\theta$ is the counterclockwise angle from the down direction. But I don't see any force having any component pointing upwards! How does the bead stay motionless!?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You only have two forces, gravity and normal force. The sum of these two, the net force, is directed towards the center that is why is called "centripetal", but it is not a force in itself. Draw a free body of the bead in the lower half of the wire. The normal force has a centripetal component and a vertical component. The bead does not stay motionless! It accelerates.
 
However, the only vertical upward force is the vertical component of the normal force, which is there whether the centripetal force is there or not. Then if there were no centripetal acceleration, the bead would fall to the bottom anyways, so it can't stay motionless with respect to the steel wire, right?
 
I don't think I've gone into enough detail, so I'll provide a picture, which will help a lot.

This should clear up any misunderstanding.

http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/3598/physicsproblem.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When the wire rotates about its vertical axis, it will be pushing the bead towards the axis horizontally. It is centripetal force Fc. The bead will push the wire with Fc horizontally away from the axis. Resolve this force into two components. One along the radius, and another tangential to the wire.
Similarly resolve the weight of the bead into two components.
Then you can find the condition for the motionless bead.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top