I Rotation and Translation coordinates

FrederikPhysics
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am currently reading Goldstein's Classical mechanics and come on to this problem. Let q1,q2,...,qn be generalized coordinates of a holonomic system and T its kinetic energy. qk correspondes to a translation of the entire system and qj a rotation of the entire system around some axis, then ∂qjT=∂qkT=0 since velocities are not affected by a translation of the origin or a rotation of the coordinate axes.
Now take as an example the kinetic energy of a single particle in spherical coordiantes, here the polar angle θ correspondes to a rotation of the system, but T is dependent on θ. r correspondes to a translation of the particle and therefore the system but T depends on r. How should I undersand this?
Mvh. Frederik
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
T does not depend on ##\theta## but on ##\dot\theta## which is a different generalized coordinate...
idem ##r## and ##\dot r##
 
Actually it is a definition:
"the system admits translation along the generalized coordinate ##q^j##"##\Longleftrightarrow## ##"\frac{\partial T}{\partial q^j}=0"##. Or equivalently iff ##T## is invariant under the group ##q^j\mapsto q^j+s,\quad s\in \mathbb{R}##
It doesn't matter what is ## q^j##. If ##q^j## is an angle then we say that the system admits a rotation.
 
BvU said:
T does not depend on ##\theta## but on ##\dot\theta## which is a different generalized coordinate...
idem ##r## and ##\dot r##

For a system consisting of one particle with mass m one writes T=½m(dr/dt2+r2 dθ/dt2+r2sin2θ dφ/dt2) in spherical coordinates, θ being the polar angle and φ the azimutal angle, that makes T=T(r, θ, dr/dt, dθ/dt, dφ/dt).
 
O now I see what you want. This is a good question indeed. It is because ##\theta\mapsto \theta+s## is not a rotation of the space about a fixed axis. Look how all the points of the space conduct under this transformation
 
  • Like
Likes BvU and FrederikPhysics
Okay, so one might say:
Let ##T=\frac{1}{2}m\dot{\textbf{r}}\cdot\dot{\textbf{r}}## be the kinetic energy of a one particle system, ##\textbf{r}## the position vector in some frame and q a set of generalized coordinates. ##q_{k}## is called a translation coordinate when there exists a vector ##\textbf{n}## such that ##\frac{\partial \textbf{r}}{\partial q_{k}}=\textbf{n}## fulfilling ##\dot{\textbf{n}}=\textbf{0}##. Then ##\frac{\partial T}{\partial q_{k}}=m\dot{\textbf{r}}\cdot\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial\textbf{r}}{\partial q_{k}}=0##.
When this is true ##q_{k}##is said to translate the system in the direction of ##\textbf{n}##.

##q_{j}## is called a rotation coordinate when there exists a vector ##\textbf{n}## such that ##\frac{\partial \textbf{r}}{\partial q_{j}}=\textbf{n}\times\textbf{r}## fulfilling ##\dot{\textbf{n}}=\textbf{0}##. Then ##\frac{\partial T}{\partial q_{j}}=m\dot{\textbf{r}}\cdot\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial\textbf{r}}{\partial q_{j}}=0##.
When this is true ##q_{k}## is said to rotate the system around the direction of ##\textbf{n}##.
The generalazation to more particles follows naturally.

Within this definition the coordinates r and ##\theta## of the spherical coordinate system, in general neither translates nor rotates the system since the r unitvector, ##\hat{\textbf{r}}##, depends on time and the rotation axis of ##\theta##, nθ, depends on time. The coordinate φ is a rotation coordinate since its rotation axis nφ correspondes to the fixed polar axis.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top