I What is the Role of Direct Calculation in Planar Rotation Commutativity?

AI Thread Summary
Direct calculation is essential in demonstrating the commutativity of planar rotations, which involves showing that the product of two rotation matrices, ##ab##, equals the product in the reverse order, ##ba##. This process typically requires working through the multiplication of rotation matrices that represent complex numbers. The discussion emphasizes that the commutativity holds true because the imaginary unit ##\mathbf i## commutes with itself and the identity matrix ##\mathbf I##. It is noted that this property is constrained to two dimensions, specifically on the unit circle, as higher dimensions complicate the definition of rotational axes. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the foundational aspects of planar rotation commutativity.
IN SU CHUNG
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Commutativity for planar rotations follows from a direct calculation.
What does 'direct calculation' mean?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Take two rotations ##a,b## and show that ##ab=ba##.

In the usual setting, this will be showing that two linear maps commute or that two rotation matrices commute.
 
  • Like
Likes IN SU CHUNG
I think it means actually calculating ##ab## and ##ba##, working out the products of the rotation matrices for general rotations.
 
A nice way to do this, is to recognize that you are in effect verifying that complex numbers commute (and that this holds even when they are represented as 2x2 matrices). So consider a complex number

##a_1 + b_1 i##, given as

##\begin{bmatrix}
a_1 & -b_1\\
b_1 & a_1
\end{bmatrix}= a_1
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0\\
0 & 1
\end{bmatrix} +
b_1 \begin{bmatrix}
0 & -1\\
1 & 0
\end{bmatrix} = a_1 \mathbf I + b_1 \mathbf i##

now multiply by some other complex number ##a_2 + b_2 i## and see that

##\big(a_1 \mathbf I + b_1 \mathbf i\big)\big(a_2 \mathbf I + b_2 \mathbf i\big) = \big(a_2 \mathbf I + b_2 \mathbf i\big) \big(a_1 \mathbf I + b_1 \mathbf i\big) ##

because ##\mathbf i## commutes with scaled forms of itself and the identity matrix ##\mathbf I## commutes with everything. Since you are talking about rotation matrices, you are constraining yourself to a determinant of 1 here (aka complex numbers on the unit circle).
- - - - -
edit: cleaned up some table formatting issues based on below hint
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes WWGD
@StoneTemplePython
This was created by PF5, it "thought" you were making a table, so it wrapped TABLE HTML tags around the area.
New feature. If you get them and do not want them, toogle into bbcode (gear-like icon on the toolbar, far right).
Remove the two tags - most HTML tags have start and end like this [STARTME] ...blah blah [/STARTME].

You can do this on your next post, I think the one post above is old enough to have locked you out of edit. If you want I can clean them up, PM me.
 
  • Like
Likes StoneTemplePython
Notice commutativity applies only in one dimension, meaning on the circle. Once you go into higher dimensions things become more complicated , where you have to define your axis of rotation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top