Rotational Dynamics: Analyzing Frictional Force Direction

AI Thread Summary
In rotational dynamics, the direction of frictional force varies based on the type of rolling. For pure rolling, the frictional force is zero. In non-pure rolling, the frictional force acts to either slow down the linear velocity or the angular velocity depending on their relative magnitudes. Specifically, if the angular velocity is less than the linear velocity, friction acts to the right; if greater, it acts to the left. The analysis concludes that non-pure rolling will always transition towards a pure-rolling condition, which aligns with real-world scenarios like driving a car.
aerograce
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
When I am browsing through my rotational dynamics chapter, I raise myself a question on the direction of frictional force under all kinds of possible circumstances:

1. Pure rolling


For pure rolling, the frictional force will always be 0;

2. Non-pure rolling
For this situation, I will analyse with a model: A rolling ball lying on a level ground. And to simplify my listing, I will ignore some situations if they are similar to each other.

2.1 ω anti-clockwise v left

(1) ωR<v

Frictional force will tend to slow V down and increase ω, hence it is to the right;

(2) ωR>v

Frictional force will tend to increase V up and slow ω down. Hence it is to the left;

2.2 ω anti-clockwise v right

At first, the frictional force will be to the left(Slow down both ω and v)

But later, I think two situations may occur:

ω is not sufficiently large but v is sufficiently large, ω will be decreased to 0. And continuously, frictional force will be to the left to increase ω clockwisely until pure rolling occurs.

v is not sufficiently large but ω is sufficiently large, v will be decreased to 0. And after that, frictional force will be to the left to increase v leftwards until pure rolling occurs.

If ω and v just happen to be such nice that it will be decreased to 0 at the same time, the object will just stop then.


My idea in analyzing the frictional force is that: Non-pure rolling will always tend to transit itself into pure-rolling condition.

Thank you for spending time on reading this but could you please tell me whether my analysis is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My idea in analyzing the frictional force is that: Non-pure rolling will always tend to transit itself into pure-rolling condition.

That seems consistent with what happens when you drive a car.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top