Rotational Dynamics, Torque, and Tension

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the tension in a strap used to drag a crate across the floor, considering the angles and forces involved. Participants emphasize the importance of torque balance, noting that the crate's weight does not create torque if its line of action passes through the pivot point. The conversation highlights the distinction between dynamic and static friction while maintaining equilibrium at constant velocity. Clarifications are made regarding the setup of torque equations, particularly concerning the lever arm and the angles involved. Overall, a deeper understanding of torque principles and their application to the problem is encouraged.
mirahj
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A man drags a 71.5-kg crate across the floor at a constant velocity by pulling on a strap attached to the bottom of the crate. The crate is tilted 22.5° above the horizontal, and the strap is inclined 64.0° above the horizontal. The center of gravity of the crate coincides with its geometrical center, as indicated in the drawing. Find the magnitude of the tension in the strap. (Image attached)

Homework Equations



torque = F * l


The Attempt at a Solution



Since the crate is not rotating, the torques must balance. From what I can
see, there are 3 total torques - two clockwise and one counterclockwise.

I set up my equations like this:

t1-t3 are the 3 torques.
T is the tension on the rope.
theta1 is the angle between the box and horizontal.
theta2 is the angle between the rope and horizontal.

Clockwise Torques
t1 = mg * .9/2 * cos(theta1) <--- Torque due to gravity

t2 = T * cos(theta2) * .9 * sin(theta1) <- Torque due to horiz. comp. of tension

Counterclockwise Torque
t3 = T * sin(theta2) * .9 * cos(theta1) <- Torque due to vert. comp of tension

Then,

t1 + t2 = t3 ; Solved for T.

I have a feeling I'm setting up the torque due to gravity wrong.

Any thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • 9-p-028-alt.gif
    9-p-028-alt.gif
    4.2 KB · Views: 505
Physics news on Phys.org
mirahj said:
t1 = mg * .9/2 * cos(theta1) <--- Torque due to gravity
Imagine increasing the height of the box greatly. That wouldn't alter your equation above. Would it change the torque due to gravity? (Similar issue with the other torques.)
 
I'm thinking now that there is no torque due to gravity (no lever arm) and that the fact that the box is in equilibrium with a constant velocity has some importance.

That is, there is one equation for torque from tension: t1 = T*sin(theta2) * .45*cos(theta1)
and the other torque equation to cancel that one has to do with the normal force.

?
 
mirahj said:
I'm thinking now that there is no torque due to gravity (no lever arm)
For torque, you have to consider the line through which a force acts and how close this gets to the point about which you are taking moments. Since the box is uniform, gravity through its centre. Does the line of its action pass through the point of contact of the box with the floor? If not, how much does it miss it by.
and that the fact that the box is in equilibrium with a constant velocity has some importance.
Not much. It means you're dealing with dynamic friction, not static, but there are no accelerations, so forces must still be in balance.
 
Torque as per wikipedia: is the tendency of a force to rotate an object about an axis,fulcrum, or pivot.
Choose which of these it is and choose your rotation point on the crate.

As haruspex stated, if one of the forces (gravity) passes through the point, it will does not create a torque around that point. Hence the question: Does the gravity force of the create pass through this ppoint? If not, what is the minimum distance between the pivot point and the imaginary infinite line representing the force(perpendicular distance).

mirahj: I think you have a good understanding of torque, just take a step back and look at the basics.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top