Rotational Kinematics - Angular Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular deceleration of a phonograph turntable that initially spins at 78 rpm and continues for 40 rotations after being switched off. The initial attempt at solving the problem results in an angular deceleration of -76.05 rpm², which is later identified as incorrect due to unit conversion errors. The correct conversion to rad/s² yields an angular deceleration of approximately -0.84 rad/s². Participants clarify the importance of squaring the time unit during conversions and discuss the correct approach to unit conversion. Ultimately, the focus is on ensuring accurate unit conversions to arrive at the correct angular acceleration value.
nx01
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A phonograph turntable with an initial angular velocity of 78 rpm continues turning for 40 rotations after being switched off. What is the angular deceleration of the turntable? Assume constant angular deceleration.

Homework Equations



\alpha=(\omega-\omega0)/t

θ-θ0=1/2(\omega0+\omega)t

The Attempt at a Solution



t = (40 rot - 0 rot) / 1/2(78 rpm + 0 rpm) = 40/39 min

\alpha = (0 rpm - 78 rpm) / (40/39 min) = -76.05 rpm2

The answer needs to be in rad/s2

(-76.05 rpm2)(2∏ rad/rot)(min2/s2)=-7.96 rad/s2


The back of the book tells me this answer is incorrect. I would appreciate any insight into the error(s) I am making.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sure you made the right unit convertion? I get 0.84 rad/s^2 is that what you needed? Else I think the mistake lies elsewhere.
 
Hi hjelmgart,

Thanks for your reply. I'm pretty sure that my error lies in the unit conversion - did you do what I did in the conversion in the original post, or something else?
 
Not entirely. I don't understand how you reached that result also. rpm = rev/min

(1/min)^2 = 1/(60min/s)^2

rev^2 = (2*Pi)^2
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ah, I wasn't squaring the seconds unit when converting. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top