Rotational Kinetic Energy Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving rotational kinetic energy in a ring system. The scenario describes a cat moving from the outer edge to the inner edge of a rotating ring, affecting the system's kinetic energy. Participants clarify that a negative value in kinetic energy calculations indicates an increase in energy, confirming that the final kinetic energy is greater than the initial. The confusion about negative results is resolved, emphasizing that the increase in kinetic energy is significant. Overall, the interaction highlights the importance of understanding rotational dynamics and energy conservation.
McAfee
Messages
96
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The picture shows an overhead view of a ring that can rotate about its center like a merry-go-round. Its outer radius R2 is 0.7 m, its inner radius R1 is R2/2, its mass M is 7.3 kg, and the mass of the crossbars at its center is negligible. It initially rotates at an angular speed of 6.0 rad/s with a cat of mass m = M/4 on its outer edge, at radius R2. By how much does the cat increase the kinetic energy of the cat-ring system if the cat crawls to the inner edge, at radius R1?

ZP3fc.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



9C7EC.jpg


I'm not sure I did this right. Is it possible for the answer to be negative.
THanks is advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've calculated the initial KE minus the final KE, and it turned out negative. So the final KE must be greater than the initial KE. That's fine! The KE increased by the magnitude of your calculated value.
 
gneill said:
You've calculated the initial KE minus the final KE, and it turned out negative. So the final KE must be greater than the initial KE. That's fine! The KE increased by the magnitude of your calculated value.

Thanks for the help. I was confused at first of why I got a negative number but you made it clear. Thanks once again.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top