Rotational Motion: Rotational vs. translational kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
In the inertia experiment, the final rotational kinetic energy significantly exceeded the translational kinetic energy in both trials, with values of 0.638 J for rotational energy compared to 5.73 * 10^(-4) J and 1.27 * 10^(-3) J for translational energy. This disparity is attributed to the larger moment arm in the first trial, which enhances rotational energy. Translational kinetic energy pertains to linear motion, calculated as 1/2*m*v^2, while most energy in this scenario is rotational due to the apparatus's design. The minimal translational energy observed may result from the center of mass wobbling. Overall, the findings highlight the dominance of rotational kinetic energy in this setup.
adenine135
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
In an inertia experiment using equipment very similar to the link below, I determined the following:

Trial with two 100 g masses near the ends of the rotating apparatus (larger moment arm):
- Final translational kinetic energy: 5.73 * 10^(-4) J
- Final rotational kinetic energy: 0.638 J

Trial with two 100 g masses closer in on the rotating apparatus (smaller moment arm):
- Final translational kinetic energy: 1.27 * 10^(-3) J
- Final rotational kinetic energy: 0.638 J

The final rotational kinetic energy is much larger than the final translational kinetic energy. Why is that the case?

http://www.usdidactic.com/images/produktbilder/04061000/Datenblatt/04061000 2.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is translational energy the movement of an object other than rotating? IE left/right, up/down, ETC?
 
Translational kinetic energy is the kinetic energy associated with rectilinear motion, equal to 1/2*m*v^2.
 
adenine135 said:
Translational kinetic energy is the kinetic energy associated with rectilinear motion, equal to 1/2*m*v^2.

Looks to me like the you have very little translational energy because its all rotational energy. The small amount of translational energy is possible from the center of mass wobbling about?

Got my info from here: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=177052
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top