Estimating the Effect of F-16 Engines on Earth's Rotational Speed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the impact of a million F-16 engines firing eastward on Earth's rotational speed. Participants clarify that "rotational speed" is synonymous with angular velocity, which is measured in radians per second. They suggest using the moment of inertia for a solid sphere and relevant equations to calculate the torque and angular acceleration resulting from the thrust of the engines. The angle for the torque calculation is confirmed to be 90 degrees, simplifying the process. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need to apply physics principles to determine the change in Earth's angular velocity due to the engines' thrust.
willworkforfood
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
"The mass of the Earth is about 6x10^24 kg and its radius is about 6x10^6 meters. Suppose you build a runway along the equator, line-up a million F-16's, bolt them down, and have them all fire their engines (eastward) simultaneously for 1/2 hour. Estimate the effect that would have on the rotational speed of the Earth. Assume the thrust of each plane's engines is 30,000 lbs = 133,000 Newtons."

I'm not even sure how to begin answering this question because I have no idea what it is asking for or what any equation is for "rotational speed". Is rotational speed the same thing as angular velocity? Thanks for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a sphere with an applied Torque (from your F-16's) giving an angular acceleration (or should that be deceleration ?)
What is the effect of this acceleration/deceleration after 1/2 hour.

rotational speed is, in effect, the angular velocity.
 
Last edited:
"rotational speed" is often used if you are talking about "rotations per minute" and so forth. "Angular velocity" (represented with the lower-case omega) should specifically be in radians per second. But they are the same concept.

Look up the moment of inertia for a solid uniform sphere rotating about its center (although the Earth is NOT so, I'm sure you don't need to do the calculus for the most accurate answer)
 
So I am basically using the equations

T=r*F*sin(angle)

and T=I*alpha

where r is radius F is force and alpha is angular acceleration to find the change in rotational speed/angular velocity, yes?
 
Yes, so far so good. The angle will be 90 degrees. After finding angular acceleration, find the change in angular velocity which is (alpha)t. Remember to change Earth's ang velocity to radians per second.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top