Rotational Velocity Question - I think?

kmael
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
It has been said that a parade of Chinese twenty a breast could march forever past an observing point. If we assume the parade to march at 3 miles per hour, with ranks 4 feet apart, what is the Chinese birth rate, in babies per hour?

ok, so far I've drawn a picture, and converted all my information, and if I'm correct, I need to use this formula: a= v^2/r
but if its a centripetal acceleration problem then where does the birth rate come into play? I'm so confused...

4mph = 1.34m/sec
4 ft = 1.22m
r= 20 people
d= 40 people
v= 1.34 m/sec

a= 1.34^2/20?
& babies per hr. = frequency
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry, the title is wrong. =[
 
kmael said:
sorry, the title is wrong. =[

If you've figured out that the title is wrong, I hope you've also figured out that v^2/r has nothing to do with the problem.
 
circles have nothing to do with this, in the time taken for 1 row of people to go past the observation point, 20 more babies need to be born, little problem that babies can't walk (so it may be you have to take into account a birth rate from a few years ago, so you can work on number of new walking chinese people) sounds a bit pointless to me
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top