Rotations around the x and y axes of stereographic sphere

IanBerkman
Messages
52
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Show that the equations
$$ \delta \phi = \cot \theta \cot \phi \delta \theta, \quad \delta \phi =- \cot \theta \tan \phi \delta \theta$$
represent rotations around the x and y axes respectively of a stereographic sphere.
Both these two rotations map the sphere on itself and map any geodesic line on another geodesic line.

Homework Equations


The sphere is a momentum sphere with radius ##p_0##. Assuming ##\theta## is the angle from the z-axis and ##\phi## the angle from the x-axis. We obtain the stereographic projection in the ##p_x,p_y##-plane by
$$
\textbf{p} = p_0\cot(\theta/2)(\cos\phi, \sin\phi, 0)$$

The Attempt at a Solution


The meaning of ##\delta## is not clearly stated and I used it as a deviation (similar to ##\Delta##).
An infinitesimal small deviation gives for the x-rotation
$$d \phi = \cot \theta \cot \phi d\theta$$
Integrating gives
$$\cos\phi = a\csc\theta$$
Where ##a## is the constant of the integration.
Intuitively I think the answer of it being a rotation around the x-axis is hidden in this equation, but I fail to see it.

Furthermore, I need to express the new stereographic project of the momentum under a rotation.
Differentiating w.r.t. ##\phi## gives
$$ \sin \phi = a \cot\theta\csc\theta \frac{d\theta}{d\phi} =
a\csc\theta\tan\phi$$
Substituting these equations of ##\sin\phi## and ##\cos\phi## into the expression ##\textbf{p}## at the top gives
$$
\textbf{p}=ap_0\cot(\theta/2)\csc\theta(1,\tan\phi,0)$$

The problem is, I do not know if I do this correct or entirely wrong. I want to hear your opinion about this.

Thanks in advance,

Ian
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Substituting the ##\cos\phi## term in the spherical coordinates gives an constant for ##x##. Furthermore, I obtain ##y=rc\tan\phi## and ##z=rc\tan\phi\sec\phi##. This gives ##y^2+z^2\neq constant##, which is not possible.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top